Oscillation in a quartic potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the challenges of understanding oscillation in a quartic potential. A key point raised is the difficulty in ensuring that the second derivative is consistent near both minima of the potential. This raises questions about the underlying mechanics of oscillation in such systems. The participants express disappointment over the lack of clarity and answers available in the forum. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in analyzing quartic potentials in physics.
PhyConnected
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
-deleted sorry-

-DELETED SORRY-
Realized this is probably not the best place to post this type of question
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a shame; I hoped someone would have the answer. Must admit it didn't look very likely to me, as the second derivative would have to be the same near both minima, and I couldn't see why it should be.
 

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

I Is the Earth-Sun system an oscillator? What is an oscillator?
Replies
11
Views
1K
I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field
Replies
2
Views
1K
I How does a large-angle pendulum oscillate?
Replies
7
Views
3K
I Understanding the Coordinates in the Lagrangian for a Pendulum
Replies
2
Views
1K
Intuitive Explanation of Mass-on-Spring Oscillator Frequency
Replies
20
Views
4K
Finding Potential Energy of Oscillation
Replies
9
Views
3K
Influence of initial shift on undamped frictionless forced oscillations
Replies
10
Views
1K
I Can the Inverse Tan Function Justify Phase Lag in a Driven Harmonic Oscillator?
Replies
8
Views
2K
A Does the unforced quartic oscillator behave chaotically?
Replies
3
Views
967
A Pair of interacting systems, driven coupled harmonic oscillators
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top