Osmotic Pressure: Why It's Not Bad Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter iScience
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Osmotic pressure is defined as the pressure difference between two solutions of varying solute concentrations across a semi-permeable membrane. It is often misunderstood as being solely exerted by the solute; however, it actually arises from the difference in partial pressures of solvent molecules on each side of the membrane. The presence of solute molecules, which cannot pass through the membrane, affects the distribution of solvent molecules, leading to a net pressure towards the dilute side. This phenomenon illustrates that osmotic pressure is fundamentally related to the behavior of solvent molecules rather than just the solute. Understanding this concept clarifies that osmotic pressure is a result of the interactions between solvent and solute, not an independent force.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
osmotic pressure is the pressure difference between two solutions of different solute concentrations separated by a semi-permeable membrane.

my book says: "the osmotic presssure is exactly the same as the pressure of an ideal gas of the same concentration as the solute. in fact, it's tempting to think of the osmotic pressure as being exerted entirely by the solute, once we have balanced the pressure of the solvent on both sides. This interpretation is bad physics."

why is it incorrect to say that the osmotic pressure comes from the solute?? fundamentally, at the site of the SP membrane, the solvent can pass through and the solute cannot, and the osmotic pressure is essentially the difference in the partial pressures exerted by the solvent molecules on each side. This difference comes from the fact that not all of the molecules hitting the SP membrane are the solvent molecules, some of them are the solute molecules which cannot pass through. So I don't see how it's bad physics to say that the solute is what's exerting the osmotic pressure (the pressure difference)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This cries for a next phrase with an explanation, is it really the whole related quote?
 
i think it would be easier to illustrate the context with a picture.

http://i.imgur.com/BIr3TgK.jpg

(the paragraph that starts with "figure 5.78")

based on your response, I'm guessing that i do have the right idea of osmotic pressure and i am not misguided about where it comes from?
 
There won't be the osmotic pressure without a solvent, so it is not solute only that matters.
 
Last edited:
Osmotic pressure is only pressure resulting from partial pressures. People tend to treat osmosis as something a bit 'magic but there's no extra force from anywhere. The 'small molecules' of the solvent will spread out into the whole of a container but the larger molecules will stay 'inside' the membrane. Once equilibrium is reached, you will have the pressure of just the solvent on one side but the pressures of the solvent plus the solute on the other side of the membrane. Hence the membrane experiences a net pressure towards the dilute side. There will be solvent on both sides - it will find its way into the solute, eventually, by diffusion.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top