Our Universe then and now, energy verses space.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between energy in the fields of the Standard Model and the expansion of the Universe. It suggests that as the Universe expands, the energy in these fields decreases while the size of the Universe increases. The concept of a constant volume of space, combining the Universe's volume and "trapped" space, is proposed as a potential model. Participants express interest in the idea, noting its alignment with conservation of energy principles. Overall, the discussion encourages further exploration of this concept in relation to cosmic expansion.
Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
I have this vague idea that I hope you can improve on or rip apart. In our early Universe we had lots of energy in the fields of the Standard Model packed into a small space. Now we have less energy in the fields and a larger Universe. In time we will might have very little energy in the fields of the Standard Model and a much greater sized Universe.

Suppose that where we have energy in the fields of the Standard Model we also have compacted space. As the Universe expands this compacted space is released as the field energy decreases? I would like to think that there is some constant volume of space V which is the sum of the volume of the Universe and the volume of "trapped" space. One is converted into the other.

Is this an idea? Can it be made better? Does it have any hope of modeling reality?

Thanks for any ideas or help!
 
Space news on Phys.org
That's an interesting idea! It makes sense that as the Universe expands, the energy in the fields of the Standard Model would decrease and the size of the Universe would increase. I'm not sure if there is a constant volume of space that is the sum of the volume of the Universe and the volume of "trapped" space, but it's definitely something worth exploring. It could be that the release of compacted space as the field energy decreases is a result of some kind of conservation of energy law. It would be fascinating to see if this idea could be modeled in reality. Good luck with your research!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top