Undergrad Overall energy input in random vehicle vibration tests

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating overall energy input in random vehicle vibration tests, emphasizing the need to compare different tests with varying power spectral density levels and Grms values. The participant seeks to derive an energy-per-mass metric, as simply comparing Grms values is insufficient due to differing test durations and conditions. They outline their understanding of work and energy calculations but struggle with applying these concepts to the power spectral density spectrum. Acknowledging that the Grms value is crucial, they note that multiplying it by test duration yields an incorrect unit for work per mass. Ultimately, they are looking for a proportional value to compare energy inputs across different vibration tests.
Roy1984
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hello Everyone

I have got a question concerning the calculation of the overall energy input in random vehicle vibration tests.

I have got different power spectral density levels for different random vehicle vibration tests and would like to compare them with each other concerning the overall energy input of the different tests. What I'm aware of is the following: The energy input definitely depends on the mass that is placed on a "shaker" for such a vibration test. Therefore I guess it would make sense to calculate an energy per mass for these different tests.

Besides the power spectral density levels, I already know the Grms value for the different levels. What I now would like to calculate is the energy-per-mass-input when such a test is performed for a certain time. So just comparing the Grms values doesn't do the trick, since I want to compare different tests with different running times and different power spectral density levels (and therefore different Grms values).

Here are some of the levels I would like to compare:
Table-2-Truck-Power-Spectral-Density-Levels.jpg


I hope anyone can help me on that subject. Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Roy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What I can add so far, or what I have tried before is the following (which didn't help me a lot):

Energy or work is defined as follows (units in [ ] ):
W = F*s = [N]*[m]

with:
[N] = [kg * m/s^2]

work follows:
W = [kg * m^2/s^2]

So work "W" per mass "m" is:
W/m = [m^2/s^2]

Now my problem is that I don't have a clue how I should calculate the input energy of such a power spectral density spectrum as shown above.

To my understanding the Grms value should be the relevant value. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_vibration: The root mean square acceleration (Grms) is the square root of the area under the ASD curve in the frequency domain. The Grms value is typically used to express the overall energy of a particular random vibration event and is a statistical value used in mechanical engineering for structural design and analysis purposes.)

But when I just multiply the Grms [m/s^2] value with the duration time of the test, the resulting unit is [m/s]. Which is not the unit [m^2/s^2] derived above for work per mass...

By the way: I don't necessarily need an exact value for the energy input per mass. What would be sufficient is a value I can claim to be proportional to the energy input, so I can compare different spectrums with each other.
 
Last edited:
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
41K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K