Overload of positrons joke from Eureka

  • Thread starter Thread starter adimauro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tv series
AI Thread Summary
In the episode "A New World" from Eureka, a joke about gamma signatures and positron overload is made, which many viewers find confusing. The humor likely stems from the impossibility of having an excess of positrons, as they annihilate upon colliding with electrons, thus violating conservation of electric charge. The show is noted for its frequent scientific inaccuracies, often presented humorously, indicating that the creators did not intend for the science to be taken seriously. Despite the flawed science, fans enjoyed the entertainment value of the series. Overall, Eureka blends comedy with science fiction, often prioritizing humor over accuracy.
adimauro
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I was recently re-watching the show Eureka, and in this one episode, S04 E02 - A New World, they make an inside physics joke but never explain it.

Their robot went haywire and analyzed it to see what the problem was.
Fargo [to Jack]: I got the scans back on Tiny, you got to see this, it's hilarious. Look at those gamma signatures. It looks like there was an overload of positrons, I mean [laughing] like that's possible!
Henry: [walks over and laughs with Fargo]
Jack: [starts fake laughing, doesn't get the joke]
Fargo: Sort of a physics joke, because...I'll redo the scans.

Any insight into this joke? Is it because when a positron collides with an electron, annihilation occurs, so it's impossible? Or something else? Is there more to it than just that? Like Jack, I don't quite get the joke either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see that humor is involved. Most fundamental, perhaps, is the possibiliy that an excess of positrons wouuld violate conservation of electric charge. Incidentally the science in Eureka was often and gratuitously wrong. They didn't even bother.
 
hutchphd said:
the science in Eureka was often and gratuitously wrong.

Crystalline glass was one of the MacGuffins in an episode. It was some sort of super material. It is either impossible because crystalline and glass are opposites or they had quartz which is neat but not an indestructible substance.

BoB

Edit: I really enjoyed the show and would have liked to see more. I will admit though that the """science""" in scifi here needs as many air quote as possible.
 
Last edited:
hutchphd said:
I don't see that humor is involved. Most fundamental, perhaps, is the possibiliy that an excess of positrons wouuld violate conservation of electric charge. Incidentally the science in Eureka was often and gratuitously wrong. They didn't even bother.
Yes, the 'science' in Eureka was most definitely often wrong! But I think they actually did it on purpose and made light of it by so often saying 'in theory' or 'theoretically' over and over again. It was entertainment and never meant to be taken too seriously.
 
adimauro said:
never meant to be taken too seriously.
It was definitely flubber town.

BoB
 
  • Haha
Likes BillTre and hutchphd
Man, when the Devil comes a-knockin', he does not smell of sulphur and brimstone, he smells of sweet perfume and roses... Doing a bit of research for a short story. All I wanted was some examples of professions typical for jurors in a trial of the time and location of the story (1850s New Orleans - of which I am not very familiar, so I have my work cut out for me). ChatGPT delivered that very nicely, giving me a list of a dozen typical professions for the type of man that was eligible for...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
8K
Back
Top