MHB Owen b's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a first order homogenous ODE

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    First order Ode
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the first-order homogeneous ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by dy/dt = t^3/y^3 + y/t. The approach involves recognizing it as a Bernoulli equation and applying the substitution u = y/t, which simplifies the equation. After substituting, the ODE is transformed into a separable form, allowing for integration. The integration leads to an implicit solution expressed as y^4 = t^4(ln(t^4) + C). This method effectively demonstrates the process of solving the given ODE.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

How to solve this equation? dy/dt= t^3/y^3 + y/t?


How to solve this equation? dy/dt= t^3/y^3 + y/t

what i understand is we have to use Bernoulli and then solve it using linear equation,is it?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello owen b,

We are given to solve:

$$\frac{dy}{dt}=\frac{t^3}{y^3}+\frac{y}{t}$$

I would first express the ODE as:

$$\frac{dy}{dt}=\left(\frac{y}{t} \right)^{-3}+\frac{y}{t}$$

Now, use the substitution:

$$u=\frac{y}{t}\implies y=ut\implies\frac{dy}{dt}=u+\frac{du}{dt}t$$

And our ODE become:

$$u+\frac{du}{dt}t=u^{-3}+u$$

$$\frac{du}{dt}t=u^{-3}$$

Separating variables and integrating (noting $t\ne0$), we obtain:

$$\int u^3\,du=\int\frac{dt}{t}$$

$$\frac{u^4}{4}=\ln|t|+C$$

$$u^4=\ln\left(t^4 \right)+C$$

Back-substituting for $u$, we obtain the implicit solution:

$$y^4=t^4\left(\ln\left(t^4 \right)+C \right)$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top