P and X completely describing a system of particles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the classical physics principle that knowing the positions and momenta of all particles in a system allows for the prediction of the system's evolution. It highlights the necessity of understanding the forces acting on particles and the importance of knowing their masses to calculate total kinetic energy. The conversation references Leonard Susskind's lectures and John Baez's Insights articles, which address the complexities and unresolved issues in predicting particle behavior within continuum theories.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with momentum and kinetic energy calculations
  • Knowledge of particle interactions and forces
  • Awareness of continuum theories in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Read John Baez's Insights articles on continuum problems
  • Study classical mechanics focusing on momentum and energy conservation
  • Explore advanced topics in particle physics and force interactions
  • Investigate the implications of mass on particle dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in classical mechanics, and researchers exploring particle dynamics and continuum theories will benefit from this discussion.

kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13
I have heard it said that in classical physics that if one knows all the particles of a systems momentums and positions, that the evolution of the system can be completely known. I would imagine this also would have to include the nature of all the forces acting on the particle. Also, for example -- how would one know the total kinetic energy of the system without knowing the masses of the particles. Is it possible only predict future positions and momentums from this set of initial conditions. I hope this question makes sense.

Regards,
kQ6uP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to see some problems that such a question can lead to, there is a series of Insights articles by John Baez (a very sharp individual indeed).

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/struggles-continuum-part-1/

In particular:
Indeed, we have been unable to rigorously prove that most of these theories make sensible predictions in all circumstances, thanks to problems involving the continuum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kq6up
jbriggs444 said:
If you want to see some problems that such a question can lead to, there is a series of Insights articles by John Baez (a very sharp individual indeed).

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/struggles-continuum-part-1/

In particular:

Wow, I did not know that all of these conundrums existed. I think I heard the statement I posted above from Leonard Suskind's lectures. I said it during a lecture yesterday, and realized that this is not true as I would not be able to know the kinetic energy of the system without knowing the mass of each individual particle. I must have not correctly understood Suskind. Without knowing the mass, one could not know the velocity if the momentum is know. Therefore, one could not know when/where the particles would collide.

Thanks,
kQ6Up
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K