P-value Calculation for Water Filter Defect Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter schapman22
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the statistical analysis of a manufacturing experiment aimed at reducing defects in water filters. The null hypothesis (H0) is established as the defect rate being equal to 4% (p = 0.04), while the alternative hypothesis (H1) suggests that the new seal reduces the defect rate (p < 0.04). A sample of 300 filters showed 7 defects, leading to a calculated test statistic of Z = -1.5. To determine significance, a critical value of -1.645 is identified for a 0.05 significance level, indicating that if Z < -1.645, the alternative hypothesis would be accepted. The discussion concludes with the need to calculate the p-value to assess the probability of obtaining the sample results.
schapman22
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A manufacturing company produces water filters for home refrigerators. The process has typically produced about 4% defective. A recently designed experiment has led to changing the seal to reduce defects. With the process running using the new seal, a random sample of 300 filters yielded 7 defects.

Homework Equations



H0: null hypothesis
H1: alternative hypothesis

The Attempt at a Solution



H0: p not equal to 7/300?
H1: p=7/300?

I have looked up examples of null hypothesis but I am not sure how to apply it to this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schapman22 said:

Homework Statement



A manufacturing company produces water filters for home refrigerators. The process has typically produced about 4% defective. A recently designed experiment has led to changing the seal to reduce defects. With the process running using the new seal, a random sample of 300 filters yielded 7 defects.

Homework Equations



H0: null hypothesis
H1: alternative hypothesis

The Attempt at a Solution



H0: p not equal to 7/300?
H1: p=7/300?

I have looked up examples of null hypothesis but I am not sure how to apply it to this problem.
The null hypothesis should involve the population statistic, not the observed sample statistic.

So your null hypothesis should be H0: p = .04

Can you infer from the problem statement what the alternate hypothesis should be?
 
would it be H1: p ≠ .04?
 
No.
What does this suggest to you?
The process has typically produced about 4% defective. A recently designed experiment has led to changing the seal to reduce defects.
 
H1: p < .04?
 
Yes. In ordinary language, the null hypothesis is: The new seal makes no difference. The alternate hypothesis is: The new seal reduces the defect rate.
 
Okay, I got that the test statistic is -1.5 by doing Z=(.023-.04)/sqrt(.04*.96/300) is this correct? And how would I find the critical value at a .05 level of significance? By the way thank you so much for all the help.
 
What you got looks OK to me.

To find the critical value, look in a table of the standard normal distribution for the number in the table that is closest to 0.9500, and read off the z value for that probability. What this is telling you is P(Z < something) = .9500. That "something" will be a positive value. What you want for your critical value is -<something>, the value such that P(Z < -(something)) = .0500.

It helps to draw a sketch of the standard normal (Z) distribution, and recognize that it has symmetry across the vertical axis.
 
Okay my table has Z.005=1.645 so I would use -1.645 for my critical value I believe? and the final part of this question which I am unsure about it is I need the p value which I know is the probability of getting the sample results.
 
  • #10
schapman22 said:
Okay my table has Z.005=1.645
Before, you said at the .05 level. Is the above a typo or did you look at the wrong value?
schapman22 said:
so I would use -1.645 for my critical value I believe? and the final part of this question which I am unsure about it is I need the p value which I know is the probability of getting the sample results.
 
  • #11
yes sorry I meant .05 not .005
 
  • #12
I corrected the .005 that you had.
schapman22 said:
Okay my table has Z.05=1.645 so I would use -1.645 for my critical value I believe?
Yes.
So if Z < -1.645, you would accept the alternate hypothesis.

In your earlier calculation, you got Z = -1.5.
schapman22 said:
and the final part of this question which I am unsure about it is I need the p value which I know is the probability of getting the sample results.
 
Back
Top