Page13 on Griffiths quantum mechanics

Frank0
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In the prove of the Schrodinger equation preserves the normalization I don't understand the step
from

∂ψ/∂t=ih/2m ∂2ψ/∂x2- i/h Vψ

to

∂ψ*/∂t=-ih/2m ∂2ψ/∂x2+ i/h Vψ* (h represents h bar)

the book says "taking complex conjugate equation" but I don't see how.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Frank0 said:
In the prove of the Schrodinger equation preserves the normalization I don't understand the step
from

∂ψ/∂t=ih/2m ∂2ψ/∂x2- i/h Vψ

to

∂ψ*/∂t=-ih/2m ∂2ψ/∂x2+ i/h Vψ* (h represents h bar)

the book says "taking complex conjugate equation" but I don't see how.

Thanks in advance.

Welcome Frank, it says it's your first post~

Alright so we literally just change any aspect of the equation which contains an imaginary component to minus said component.

For example...
e^{-iHt/ \hbar}
goes to

e^{iHt/ \hbar}

We make the assumption that V is real and that ψ is complex.

Given the above should help, I'm sure you're familiar but, just in case ψ* refers to the complex conjugate of ψ.

Let me know if I missed what you were asking some how, though I'm sure someone can answer a little more cleanly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_conjugate
The wiki page provides the general information on conjugating as well.
 
If you have some equation a = b then you can take the complex conjugate of both sides and get a* = b*. Then you just have to know that the complex conjugate of a product is the product of the complex conjugate; the complex conjugate of a derivative is the derivative of the complex conjugate; the complex conjugate of i is -i; etc.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top