Paradox of Obtuse Angles in the Sine Rule

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 5K views
ritwik06
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
I have read the sine rule:
It states-->
sin A/a=sin B/b=sin C/c = 1/2R

where R is circumradius.
Now,
a=2Rsin A
b=2Rsin B
c=2Rsin C

For a triangle R is fixed.
In an obtuse angled triangle, the side opposite largest angle is the longest(geomtrically)

But the sine of an obtuse angle can be less than that of an acute angle. How is this possible? Is it possible that the side opposite obtuse angle isn't the largest? Or is the sin rul giving a wrong stand in this case??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ritwik06 said:
For a triangle R is fixed.
In an obtuse angled triangle, the side opposite largest angle is the longest(geomtrically)

But the sine of an obtuse angle can be less than that of an acute angle. How is this possible? Is it possible that the side opposite obtuse angle isn't the largest? Or is the sin rul giving a wrong stand in this case??

Hi ritwik06! :smile:

Yes, I see what you mean …

if A is obtuse, then as A increases, sinA decreases, but a (the side a) actually increases though it should decrease!

hmm :rolleyes: …

ah, but that's assuming that b and c are constant, in which case R is not constant, so everything sorts itself out.

But if you keep R constant, so that, say, the "C" end of side a slides round the circle, then as A increases, the "C" end will get closer, and therefore a will actually decrease, (and so will b) …

there isn't actually a problem. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi ritwik06! :smile:

Yes, I see what you mean …

if A is obtuse, then as A increases, sinA decreases, but a (the side a) actually increases though it should decrease!

hmm :rolleyes: …

ah, but that's assuming that b and c are constant, in which case R is not constant, so everything sorts itself out.

But if you keep R constant, so that, say, the "C" end of side a slides round the circle, then as A increases, the "C" end will get closer, and therefore a will actually decrease, (and so will b) …

there isn't actually a problem. :smile:

Suppose the angles of a triangle are 30,45, 105!
what will be the ratio of their sides?
2:[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]:[tex]\sqrt{3}+1[/tex]?

as I get by sin rule. Isnt it?

does that mean that the side opposite 30 is greater than the one opposite 45?
 
ritwik06 said:
Suppose the angles of a triangle are 30,45, 105!
what will be the ratio of their sides?
2:[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]:[tex]\sqrt{3}+1[/tex]?

No, the ratio of the sides is 1/2 : 1/√2 : (√3 + 1)/2√2,

or √2 : 2: √3 + 1 :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
No, the ratio of the sides is 1/2 : 1/√2 : (√3 + 1)/2√2,

or √2 : 2: √3 + 1 :smile:

I am sorry! Thanks for pointing out my misconception. Thanks a lot!