Dear All,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have encountered the following situation:

Given a node that is connected through n resistors to n ports.

One if the resistors is a negative resistance and equals to minus of all other resistors in parallel.

[itex]\frac{1}{R_n} =- \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \frac{1}{R_i}[/itex]

Using the well known star - mesh transformation, I get

[itex]R_{k,j} = R_k R_j ( \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{R_i} )[/itex]

that equals to 0, due to the definition of [itex]R_n[/itex].

[itex]R_{k,j} = 0 [/itex]

Therefore, the equivalent mesh representation of this circuit is a shortcut of all nodes.

It makes sense from one side, because the total circuit has zero impedance, but, from the other side, this transform says that all nodes should be of equal voltage. The last one is not true, because in the original network the nodes may have different potentials.

What do I miss ?

Any ideas ?

Are the equivalence transforms applicable for negative resistances ?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Paradox of star - mesh transform ?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Paradox star mesh | Date |
---|---|

Earth fault in delta star (grounded) transformer | Dec 9, 2016 |

Star Delta Line/Phase Voltage Confusion | Apr 20, 2015 |

Star-delta connection | Jan 3, 2015 |

Star, delta, and star&delta motors | Dec 24, 2014 |

Capacitors paradox | Apr 25, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**