Parallel Vector Fields

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving properties of parallel vector fields along curves in Riemannian manifolds, specifically focusing on the preservation of vector length and orientation during parallel transport.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the derivative of the inner product of parallel vector fields and question the validity of certain assumptions regarding tangent spaces. There are inquiries about alternative methods using local coordinates and clarifications on the meaning of orientation preservation in the context of parallel transport.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing insights and raising questions about the mathematical reasoning involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the properties of parallel transport and its implications on orientation, but no consensus has been reached on all aspects of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the nature of tangent spaces and the implications of the manifold being oriented. Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions being made and the continuity of the determinant during parallel transport.

JasonJo
Messages
425
Reaction score
2
Let M be a Riemmanian manifold. Prove that a parallel vector field along a curve c(t) preserves the length of the parallel transported vector.

Furthermore if M is an oriented manifold, prove that P preserves the orientation.

So I want to prove that d/dt <P, P> = 0, so <P, P> = constant.

d/dt <P, P> = 2<dP/dt, P>

But dP/dt is not an element of the tangent space at c(t) for any t. DP/dt is however always an element of the tangent space, but since DP/dt is 0, we get our desired result.

But am I allowed to do say that dP/dt is in general not an element of the tangent space? DP/dt is always an element of the tangent space as we can see when we use a local expression for it. However, I feel like I am using an exterior argument by essentially saying that:

dP/dt = orth(dP/dt) + tang(dP/dt) i.e. I'm splitting it up into tangential and orthogonal components. Then when we "dot" an orthogonal part with the purely tangential part, it drops out and we are left with:

<DP/dt, P> = 0.

Is there another way to do this in terms of local coordinates?

And if M is an oriented manifold, what does it mean exactly for P to preserve orientation?

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<P,P> is a scalar function along the curve. So d/dt along the curve is the same as the covariant derivative of <P,P> along the curve with respect to the vector c'(t). Nuff said? Another form of this problem is in Misner, Wheeler and Thorne and they warn you that it's the easiest problem in the whole book. For good reason.
 
Let M be a Riemmanian manifold. let P be a parallel vector field along a curve c(t) preserves the length of the parallel transported vector.

I have shown that P is a linear isometry between tangent spaces along c(t).

However, if M is oriented, why does P preserve the orientation? Let c(t_0) be any point on the curve, and consider the tangent space at that point c(t_0); let P_1, P_2,...,P_n be an orthonormal set of basis vectors of the tangent space to c(t_0).

Well we can parallel transport the basis vectors to form an orthonormal basis for the tangent spaces along the curve c.

Now since P must preserve the length of vectors and we are dealing with an orthonormal basis, P must be an unitary matrix, i.e. P*P^(T), i.e. P times it's transpose is the identity mapping, where P = the matrix whose rows are the orthonormal basis vectors, and this is true along the curve c.

In particular, P we have that P must have determinant 1 or -1. If P has determinant +1, then it does preserve the orientation.

I don't see where I use that M is oriented. Am I doing this correctly?
 
If P starts out with determinant 1, parallel transport is a continuous operation, so it can't suddenly flip to -1, right? This issue for an orientable manifold is whether transport along ANY path preserves orientation. Along any single path you never flip orientation. You don't need to use that it's orientable to prove that. The point is just that if you start in one orientation you end up in the same one. So if the manifold is orientable and you start in the designated orientation you must wind up in the same one.
 
Got it, thank you both so much for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K