A Parameterizing conditional expectations (Gaussian case)

estebanox
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Consider three jointly normally distributed random variables X,Y and Z.

I know that in the Gaussian case E[Z | X,=x Y=y]=xßZX;Y +yßZY;X
where ßZX;Y notes the regression coefficient of Z on X conditional on Y (and ßZY;Xis analogously defined).

Is the following derivation correct?

E[Z| X>x, Y<y] = E [ E[Z | X,Y] | X>x, Y<y]
ZX;Y E[X | X>x, Y<y]+ßZY;X E[Y |X>x, Y<y]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it is correct.
The first equality is an application of the Tower Law.
The second equality actually comprises two steps:
1. substitute your formula for E[Z | X,Y] from above for the inner expectation
2. Use the linearity of the expectation operator and the fact that the betas are constants to get the result.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
andrewkirk said:
Yes it is correct.
The first equality is an application of the Tower Law.
The second equality actually comprises two steps:
1. substitute your formula for E[Z | X,Y] from above for the inner expectation
2. Use the linearity of the expectation operator and the fact that the betas are constants to get the result.
Great! Thanks a lot for spelling it out
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top