I Parameters of the rough surface (for electromagnetic scattering)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on labeling statistical parameters, specifically sigma (σ) and correlation length (lc), on a schematic representation of a rough surface for a manuscript on electromagnetic scattering. It suggests that σ can be represented as a vertical error bar, while lc can be depicted as a horizontal bar. Participants are looking for clarity on how to effectively illustrate these parameters in their figures. Additionally, links to relevant papers are shared for further reference on the topic. Proper labeling of these parameters is essential for enhancing the understanding of surface roughness in electromagnetic scattering studies.
Ahmed123
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Dear friends,
I will be grateful if anyone can help me
I study electromagnetic scattering by rough surfaces for a certain case. Each rough surface can be specified with the statistical parameters sigma (σ) and correlation length (lc). while writing my manuscript I drew a schematic representation of a rough surface. one of the reviewers asked me to label these parameters (σ and lc) on the figure. I can't understand how to label these parameters on the figure as they are just statistical parameters that control the surface roughness level. so, can anyone explain to me how to label the statistical parameters of the rough surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Minimizing by trisecting a function dependent on 3 parameters
Replies
3
Views
1K
A Retarded time and advanced time (and binning)
Replies
3
Views
1K
Surface roughness in 2D sinusoidal corrugation
Replies
1
Views
4K
How to design surface roughness model using CST?
Replies
1
Views
4K
I Is There a Curve For a Material's Surface Area vs. UTS
Replies
2
Views
1K
Effect of temperature on surface tension
Replies
2
Views
1K
I A novel explanation of CKM and PMNS matrix parameters
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Understanding Confidence Intervals for Fit Parameters
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Confusion about Scattering in Quantum Electrodynamics
3
Replies
134
Views
10K
I Entropy of the last scattering surface and today's universe?
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top