I Parameters of the rough surface (for electromagnetic scattering)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on labeling statistical parameters, specifically sigma (σ) and correlation length (lc), on a schematic representation of a rough surface for a manuscript on electromagnetic scattering. It suggests that σ can be represented as a vertical error bar, while lc can be depicted as a horizontal bar. Participants are looking for clarity on how to effectively illustrate these parameters in their figures. Additionally, links to relevant papers are shared for further reference on the topic. Proper labeling of these parameters is essential for enhancing the understanding of surface roughness in electromagnetic scattering studies.
Ahmed123
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Dear friends,
I will be grateful if anyone can help me
I study electromagnetic scattering by rough surfaces for a certain case. Each rough surface can be specified with the statistical parameters sigma (σ) and correlation length (lc). while writing my manuscript I drew a schematic representation of a rough surface. one of the reviewers asked me to label these parameters (σ and lc) on the figure. I can't understand how to label these parameters on the figure as they are just statistical parameters that control the surface roughness level. so, can anyone explain to me how to label the statistical parameters of the rough surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Thread 'The Effect of Linear and Rotational Motion on Measured Weight'

Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
View full post »

Thread 'Simple thought experiment with Stefan-Boltzmann law: energy'

Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
View full post »
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'

Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'

I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Minimizing by trisecting a function dependent on 3 parameters
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Retarded time and advanced time (and binning)
Replies
3
Views
1K
Surface roughness in 2D sinusoidal corrugation
Replies
1
Views
4K
How to design surface roughness model using CST?
Replies
1
Views
5K
I Is There a Curve For a Material's Surface Area vs. UTS
Replies
2
Views
1K
Effect of temperature on surface tension
Replies
2
Views
1K
I A novel explanation of CKM and PMNS matrix parameters
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Understanding Confidence Intervals for Fit Parameters
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Confusion about Scattering in Quantum Electrodynamics
3
Replies
134
Views
10K
I Entropy of the last scattering surface and today's universe?
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top