Parametric coordinates of an ellipse

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the parametric coordinates of an ellipse and the limit as theta approaches zero. Participants express confusion over the lack of clarity in the problem statement, particularly regarding what limit is being sought. The abscissa, denoted as lambda, is identified as independent of theta, leading to the conclusion that the limit cannot be defined properly without additional context. There is consensus that the question appears to be poorly constructed, possibly due to a typographical error. Ultimately, the problem's ambiguity prevents a definitive solution from being reached.
chaoseverlasting
Messages
1,050
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{a^2(1-e^2)} =1

The ellipse meets the major axis at a point whose abscissa is \lambda. Find lim \theta ->0.

Homework Equations



Parametric coordinates of an ellipse: (acosx,bsinx)

The Attempt at a Solution


The abscissa is the x coordinate and here the x-axis is the major axis as b^2 = a^2(1-e^2). Therefore, \lambda =acos\theta.

Which would give you a. The answer, however, should be ae... don't know how...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you write the problem out exactly as it's given. I find it hard to believe they'd ask you to find \lim _{\theta \to 0} without saying what you're supposed to be finding the limit of as theta goes to 0. Is it the limit of the abscissa of the point on the ellipse at angle theta to the real axis, as theta goes to 0?
 
I'm with AKG! Find the limit of WHAT as \theta goes to 0?
 
But that's the whole question. Limit of \lambda as \theta goes to 0. But \lambda comes out to be a which is totally independent of theta.
 
No, write it out EXACTLY as given.
 
chaoseverlasting said:
But that's the whole question. Limit of \lambda as \theta goes to 0. But \lambda comes out to be a which is totally independent of theta.
That was NOT what you originally said. You said "Find lim \theta-> 0, NOT lim \lambda as \theta-> 0!.

Now, tell us how \theta is defined!
 
What I've written out, IS the whole question. Thats all there was to it. This question came in an exam, and the answer I got is independent of theta. I don't see how it can be anything else! All they're asking for is the point of intersection of the ellipse and the x axis. And that's (a,0).
 
You sure you wrote out exactly what was given? They honestly asked you to find "\lim _{\theta \to 0}"? They didn't tell you what to find the limit of? They didn't define \theta? Assuming that 0 < 1 - e2 < 1 (note that this an assumption, one that should have been made explicit in the question), the major axis is the line segment from (-a,0) to (a,0). It doesn't make sense to speak of the point where the ellipse meets the major axis because it meets it at two different places, (-a,0) and (a,0), and both these points have different abscissae. Thus \lambda isn't even well-defined.

A question has to make sense, i.e. it has to mean something, before you can conceivably find a right answer to it. For the reasons above, this question is far from making sense. So if you're SURE that you've written out the problem EXACTLY as it's given to you, then there's nothing anyone can do to help you because the problem doesn't make sense. Otherwise, WRITE OUT THE PROBLEM EXACTLY AS GIVEN.
 
Guess the problem doesn't make sense. Must have been a typo in the paper.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K