MHB Parametric Eqs: Find Line & Plane, Find Triangle Area

brinlin
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Let P (1, 2, 3), Q (2, 3, 1), and R (3, 1, 2).
(a) Derive the parametric equations for the line that passes through P and Q without resorting
to the known formula.
(b) Derive the equation of the plane that passes through the points P, Q, and R without
resorting to the known formula.
(c) Find the area of the triangle with vertices P, Q, and R.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
skeeter said:
(a) initial point + (direction vector) times t

(b) Calculus III - Equations of Planes (lamar.edu)

(c) area = $\dfrac{1}{2} |\vec{PQ} \times \vec{PR} |$

And I would hope that the OP would have found $\displaystyle \vec{PQ} \times \vec{PR}$ in part b) :P
 
Prove It said:
And I would hope that the OP would have found $\displaystyle \vec{PQ} \times \vec{PR}$ in part b) :p

seeing how the OP has posted the same problems on two other math help sites, I would hope so, also
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It is not clear to me whether the OP's problem is with math or with reading English. He does not appear to have read, or understood, the instructions for this board. He has posted 8 or more threads without showing any attempt to solve them himself. I feel that I, at least, have already done too much.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top