Part C of the inner product problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around part C of a problem related to inner products, specifically involving the Pythagorean Law and properties of orthogonal vectors. The participants are exploring the connections between parts a, b, and c of the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing the application of the Pythagorean Law in the context of inner products and questioning the use of certain variables, particularly p. There are mentions of proving orthogonality and using the law of cosines.

Discussion Status

Some participants are offering guidance on how to approach part C, suggesting the use of inner products and checking orthogonality. There appears to be a mix of interpretations regarding the use of previous parts of the problem, and no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of needing to show that p and 1 - p are orthogonal, which is a key aspect of the discussion. Participants are also reflecting on the implications of using specific values and the clarity of their proofs.

Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
I have attached the solutions of parts a, b, and what I have done for part c.

My part c isn't going to turn out correct and I don't know what is wrong.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite following what you are doing for part c, but the Pythagorean Law would be ||1||^2=||p||^2+||1-p||^2 or <1,1>=<p,p>+<1-p,1-p>. Since you know that p=3x/2 you could just compute all the inner products. Or if you had checked in part b that <p,1-p>=0 you could just write 1=(1-p)+p and take the inner product of each side with itself.
 
I didn't see I could use the p in part b. Instead I was using p proving from the law of cosine.
 
Dustinsfl said:
I didn't see I could use the p in part b. Instead I was using p proving from the law of cosine.

But you are using p=3x/2 in part c. But I don't see anything resembling a law of cosines or a proof there. Try it again. State clearly what you want to prove and give a reason for each step.
 
In part b you still need to show that p and 1 - p are orthogonal, which is pretty easy to do. From that you'll have p and 1 - p being the legs of a right triangle, and 1 being the hypotenuse.

For the c part do as Dick said.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K