Partial Fractions: Solving Examples with a Novel Method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion introduces a novel method for solving partial fractions, specifically using the example of the fraction (3x^2 + 12x + 11) / ((x+1)(x+2)(x+3)). The method involves finding constants A, B, and C by substituting values that make the denominators zero, referred to as 'paravartya'. This approach simplifies the integration process, yielding A = 1, B = 1, and C = 1, resulting in the partial fraction decomposition of 1/(x+1) + 1/(x+2) + 1/(x+3). While the method is likened to Vedic math, it is clarified that it is actually known as the Heaviside method. This technique provides an efficient alternative to traditional systems of linear equations for finding partial fractions.
WORLD-HEN
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi, me with my really old book again. This time , a novel way of turning expressions into partial fractions.
It would be best if I show you the examples in the book :

\frac{3x^2 +12x +11} {(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)}

To express this fraction in the form

\frac{A} {x+1} + \frac{B} {x+2} + \frac{C} {x+3}

We have to find the values of A , B and C by solving three simultaneous equations ( by the usual method )

The method proposed in the book :

equate the denominator of A to zero and thus get the 'paravartya'
Then substitute this value is the original equation but without the factor which is A's denominator. The result is the value of A.

so for A, the 'paravartya' is -1 ( from x+1 = 0 )
substituting this in
\frac {3x^2 +12x +11} {(x+2)(x+3)}
we get 1, so A = 1

similarly for B, the 'paravartya' is -2 (from x+2 =0)
substituting this in
\frac{3x^2 +12x +11} {(x+1)(x+3)}
we get 1, so B = 1

For C, the paravartya is -3 ( from x+3 =0)
substituting this in
\frac{3x^2 +12x +11} { (x+1)(x+2) }
we get 1, so C = 1

So, the partial fraction is
\frac{1} {x+1} + \frac{1} {x+2} + \frac{1} {x+3}

This makes integration so much easier!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's basically the usual method of 'creating' partial fractions. You should notice that after multiplying the new fractions out, A and B get multiplied by the denominator of C, B and C by that of A, and A and C by that of B. So when you use the "paravartya" of A, the coefficients of B and C become zero, since the "paravartya" sets the denominator of A to zero. Now all that is left is comparing the RHS with the LHS (in particular, the nominators) after using the value of the "paravartya":

3(-1)^{2}+12(-1)+11 \equiv A(-1+2)(-1+3)

2 \equiv 2A \; \Rightarrow \; A=1
 
That's Vedic math, isn't it ? :smile:
 
yes it is :)
 
You can also solve for the constants using a system of linear equations.

\frac{3x^2 +12x +11} {(x+1)(x+2)(x+3)}=\frac{A}{(x+1)}+\frac{B}{(x+2)} +\frac{C}{(x+3)}

Multiply both sides by the common denominator

3x^2 +12x +11=A(x+2)(x+3)+B(x+1)(x+3)+C(x+1)(x+2)

3x^2 +12x +11=A(x^2+5x+6)+B(x^2+4x+3)+C(x^2+3x+2)

3x^2 +12x +11=Ax^2+5Ax+6A+Bx^2+4Bx+3B+Cx^2+3Cx+2C

3x^2 +12x +11=(A+B+C)x^2+(5A+4B+3C)x+(6A+3B+2C)

The coefficients on either side of the equation must be equal, so

3= A+ B+ C
12=5A+4B+3C
11=6A+3B+2C

Solving this set of equations will get the same results (A=1, B=1, C=1)

Source: http://www.wholikeshomework.com/tutorials/partialfractions.pdf
 
It's not Vedic math at all, but known as the Heaviside method, I believe.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Back
Top