Partial Tracing Techniques for Fermionic Partition Functions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ledamage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space tracing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating a fermionic partition function using partial tracing techniques in the context of theoretical condensed matter physics. Participants explore methods for evaluating the trace of a specific Hamiltonian involving fermionic operators, focusing on the challenges of performing a partial trace over a subset of particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a partition function involving fermionic creation and annihilation operators and expresses difficulty in calculating a partial trace over the a-particles.
  • Another participant suggests using the path integral technique, referencing its introduction in field theory literature.
  • A later reply questions the lack of well-known methods for decomposing density matrices and evaluating traces within the second quantization formalism, given the finite dimensional Fock space.
  • One participant proposes directly writing down possible states to perform the trace, noting it as a finite sum.
  • The original poster counters that while this approach works for a complete trace, it complicates the process for a partial trace, especially when diagonalizing the Hamiltonian.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of finding a decomposition of the exponential for the Hamiltonian, as direct evaluation leads to complex sums that are not easily expressed in closed form.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the feasibility and methods for calculating the partial trace, with no consensus reached on a specific approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the complexity of the Hamiltonian and the challenges of evaluating traces in the context of finite dimensional Fock spaces. Specific assumptions about the operators and the nature of the states involved are not fully articulated.

Who May Find This Useful

Researchers and students interested in theoretical condensed matter physics, particularly those working with fermionic systems and partition functions.

ledamage
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi there!

Up to now, I've been not so familiar with theoretical condensed matter physics but now I have to calculate a partition function of the type

Z = \mathrm{Tr}\,\mathrm{e}^{-\beta(a^\dagger a + a^\dagger b + ab^\dagger)}

where a, a^\dagger, b, b^\dagger are fermionic annihilition/creation operators. I want to take only a partial trace over the a-particles. I've tried several things such as BHC and the Trotter product formula and evaluation of the exponential for certain parts of the Hamiltonian but I've obtained nothing which is actually feasible. I've had a look in several books about many-particle quantum theory but found nothing useful. Is this problem elementary? Any ideas or literature recommendations?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I recommend the path integral technique, which is introduced in many field theory books.
 
Okay, I guessed as much. Thanks!

Edit: Maybe, yet still another question: this is a finite dimensional Fock space with four basis elements (the tensor products of one 0-particle and one 1-particle state for both a and b). Are there really no well-known methods to decompose density matrices like this and evaluate the trace within the second quantization formalism?
 
Last edited:
Why not just write down the possible states and do the trace? It's just a finite sum, as you've noticed.
 
You're right if I wanted to do the complete trace. Then one could diagonalize the Hamiltonian and do the sum. But what if I just want to do the trace over the a-particles? Then diagonalizing would destroy the possibility of doing the partial trace easily, wouldn't it? And otherwise, I have to find a decomposition of the exponential because direct evaluation yields awkward sums which I couldn't do in closed form.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K