Particle acceleration for Hyper drives?

AI Thread Summary
Particle accelerators have been proposed as a potential technology for hyperdrives, but the concept lacks substantial research or practical application. The discussion highlights a misunderstanding of related technologies, such as Hall Effect thrusters and mass flow ionizers, which have been deemed ineffective for propulsion based on Earth's atmosphere. The analogy of impulse transfer using high kinetic particles was mentioned but remains vague and poorly substantiated. A referenced article from 2009 indicates limited progress in this area, with no significant developments reported since. Overall, the idea of using particle accelerators for hyperdrives has not advanced meaningfully.
GreenAce92
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
I vaguely read about this idea about using particle accelerators as hyperdrives

Does anyone know any more information about this subject?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not an acceptable way to start a discussion. "vaguely read" is not a good reference source.

https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=2703

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alright, this is partially related to my other thread involving my misunderstanding of the helmholtz coil and its effects

I had all of these tabs open on wikipedia at the time while researching about the possibility of creating a "mass flow ionizer" type thruster based on Earth's atmosphere which so far I was told would not work.

Anyway, through reading I was linked to "Particle Beam Weapon" and I had to look deeper to find where it was that I read the statements comparing impulses of a larger and a smaller ball (impulse transfer) as an analogy of what happens when the "high kinetic particles" are applying a force on the accelerating device therefore supposedly driving the craft... (very vague as I said)

Hall Effect
Hall Effect thruster
Helmholtz Coil
Specific Impulse
Magnetic Field
Electronegativity
Pound Force
Xenon Gas
My Charge to Mass ratio lab
Lorentz Force
Thrust
Particle beam weapon

Ha! I found it. I didn't even realize it was written on the same website (published) that is what is advertised on these forums

http://phys.org/news174293159.html
 
That was from 2009. I haven't heard anything being done on such things. In fact, the only citation to that arXiv manuscript was another preprint by the author himself.

So to answer your original question, this has gone nowhere so far.

Zz.

P.S. Stick to one topic at a time. I don't need to know what you were doing when you came up with this question.
 
Alright well thanks
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top