Particle Disintegration and Momentum Conservation in Relativity

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of momentum and energy in the context of particle disintegration within the framework of relativity. Participants explore the implications of switching reference frames and the conditions under which conservation laws hold, particularly focusing on scenarios involving particles of different masses and velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where a particle of mass ##2m## disintegrates into two particles of mass ##m##, questioning the conservation of momentum in different reference frames.
  • Another participant suggests considering conservation of energy, proposing that if energy is not conserved in one frame, it may not be conserved in others.
  • Several participants discuss the relationship between energy conservation and the rest masses of the particles, indicating that the final masses must be less than the original mass for energy conservation to hold.
  • One participant introduces the concept of four-momentum and its conservation, noting that while energy-momentum is conserved in a closed system, the current scenario may not represent a closed system due to external energy influences.
  • Another participant mentions the use of an energy-momentum diagram to visualize the disintegration process and the implications of the reverse-triangle inequality in special relativity.
  • There are corrections and clarifications regarding the mathematical formulation of the problem, including the proper application of Lorentz transformations and the significance of signs in equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the conservation of energy and momentum, with some suggesting that these laws may not hold in certain frames while others emphasize the need for careful consideration of the system's boundaries. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these conservation laws in the given scenario.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of defining the system boundaries and the conditions under which conservation laws apply. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by switching reference frames and the potential for external energy contributions affecting conservation outcomes.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying advanced topics in relativity, particle physics, and conservation laws, particularly in the context of frame transformations and energy-momentum relationships.

etotheipi
I'm making a mistake somewhere, I hoped someone could point it out? Say a particle of mass ##2m##, initially at rest, disintegrates into two particles of mass ##m## that move at ##v_{1x} = v## and ##v_{2x} = -v##. Then we switch to a frame moving at ##-U## along the ##x## axis, so that$$v'_{1x} = \frac{U+v}{1+Uv}$$ $$v'_{2x} = \frac{U-v}{1-Uv}$$The total momentum in S' is$$\begin{align*}p_x' = \frac{\frac{U+v}{1+Uv}}{\sqrt{1-\left( \frac{U+v}{1+Uv} \right)^2}}m + \frac{\frac{U-v}{1-Uv}}{\sqrt{1-\left( \frac{U-v}{1-Uv} \right)^2}}m &= \frac{2mU}{\sqrt{(1-v^2) -U^2(1-v^2)}} \\ &= \frac{2mU}{\sqrt{(1-v^2)(1-U^2)}} \\ &= \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}} [2m \gamma_U U]\end{align*}$$Why does this not equal ##2m \gamma_U U##, but only approaches it in the limit ##v \rightarrow 0##? The initial momentum in S' would surely be ##2m \gamma_U U##, wouldn't it - surely the 3-momentum would be conserved? Please let me know if I've done something dumb. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens if you impose conservation of energy?

Perhaps is energy is not conserved in one frame, then more generally energy and momentum are not conserved in other frames?

In what way is this related to length contraction and time dilation?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
To save you a bit of algebra, if you have a particle of momentum ##p=\gamma mv## in the ##x## direction and energy ##E=\gamma m## (note that I'm using ##c=1##) then its four momentum is ##P=(E,p,0,0)##. The Lorentz transforms can be written as a matrix:$$\Lambda=\left(\begin{array}{cccc}
\gamma_U&-\gamma_UU&0&0\\
-\gamma_UU&\gamma_U&0&0\\
0&0&1&0\\
0&0&0&1\end{array}\right)$$You can then calculate the four momentum in the transformed frame as ##\Lambda P^T## using usual matrix multiplication rules. Obviously the y and z components are trivial in this case.

You can easily confirm that you get the same result as you did above, and it saves mucking around with the velocity transforms.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
PeroK said:
What happens if you impose conservation of energy?
In S, problems, because...$$2m = 2\gamma_v m \implies \gamma_v = 1$$i.e. it's only valid if ##v_{1x} = v_{2x} = 0##?
PeroK said:
Perhaps is energy is not conserved in one frame, then more generally energy and momentum are not conserved in other frames?
So if energy is not conserved in the CM frame, it won't be conserved in other frames?

PeroK said:
In what way is this related to length contraction and time dilation?
This is not obvious to me at the moment.
 
etotheipi said:
So if energy is not conserved in the CM frame, it won't be conserved in other frames?
Hint: where does nuclear energy come from?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Ibix said:
Hint: where does nuclear energy come from?

So we require that the sum of the final masses are slightly less than the original mass? That is to say that the rest energy of the system (invariant mass) is conserved, but the masses not so much?
 
etotheipi said:
In S, problems, because...$$2m = 2\gamma_v m \implies \gamma_v = 1$$i.e. it's only valid if ##v_{1x} = v_{2x} = 0##?So if energy is not conserved in the CM frame, it won't be conserved in other frames?

To impose conservation of energy you need the final rest masses to be less than ##m##.

If energy is not conserved in the CoM frame then it won't be conserved in any other frame. But, energy and momentum are unified (like space and time) into energy-momentum. What is "purely" energy in one frame is a combination of energy and momentum in another frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
etotheipi said:
So we require that the sum of the final masses are slightly less than the original mass? That is to say that the rest energy of the system (invariant mass) is conserved, but the masses not so much?
Yes. The four momentum of the original mass was (2M,0,0,0). You can write down the four momentum of the daughter particles (say they have mass M'), you can add four vectors just like any other, and the total four momentum is conserved. Then transform to your moving frame and you should get consistent answers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
Edit, said something silly. I'll plug the numbers in first and check it works :wink:. Thanks!
 
  • #10
etotheipi said:
Okay, that makes sense. I'll try plugging the numbers in and see if it works.

So generally, it is the 4-mentum (street slang) that is conserved, but not any of its components? That seems right, but I did see on Wikipedia and it said that the three space momentum ##\mathbf{p}## is conserved, as well as the total energy ##E^0##, i.e. the components of the 4-mentum.

Am I misinterpreting that?

All four components of energy-momentum are conserved in a closed system. You do not have a closed system here as extra energy came from somewhere external.

The loss of conservation of energy in the CoM frame, however, leads to the loss of conservation of energy and conservation of three-momentum in other frames. The analogy with spacetime is apt. What can be described purely in terms of the time (energy) component in one frame is described in terms of both time and space (energy and momentum) components in another frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
  • #11
PS If you look at the transformation laws for energy-momentum this becomes clear immediately.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
  • #12
@ etotheipi , if each particle after disintegration has mass ##m##, the only thing wrong with your original post is the assumption that the particle before disintegration has mass ##2m##. You can use conservation of energy (with ##U=0##) to work out what the original mass should be, and then I think you'll find the rest of your calculation is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
  • #13
PeroK said:
All four components of energy-momentum are conserved in a closed system. You do not have a closed system here as extra energy came from somewhere external.

The loss of conservation of energy in the CoM frame, however, leads to the loss of conservation of energy and conservation of three-momentum in other frames. The analogy with spacetime is apt. What can be described purely in terms of the time (energy) component in one frame is described in terms of both time and space (energy and momentum) components in another frame.

Thanks, that's a nice explanation. Yeah I dropped a negative sign from the matrix ##\Lambda## that @Ibix wrote down in #3 and spent 5 minutes panicking about what I'd done wrong (:nb)) but it does work when I re-insert that lost minus sign back in. So if in doubt, the 4-mentum is always conserved (for a closed system). Thanks for the help everyone!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
  • #14
One can draw an energy-momentum diagram of the particle-disintegration process.
Note that this diagram is essentially the spacetime-diagram of the clock-effect/twin-paradox.

From my https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/spacetime-diagrams-light-clocks/

featuredImage-ClockEffect.png

Reinterpret as follows:
Let \overrightarrow {OZ} be the initial particle's 4-momentum. (In the diagram, this has magnitude 10 [unit-mass diamonds].)
Let the identical-mass daughter-particles have 4-momenta \overrightarrow {OQ} and \overrightarrow {QZ} (say, with opposite velocities \pm(3/5)c in the initial-particle frame).
so that
\overrightarrow {OZ}=\overrightarrow {OQ}+\overrightarrow {QZ} (conservation of total 4-momentum).
So, in special relativity, this implies that
\left|\overrightarrow {OZ}\right| \geq \left|\overrightarrow {OQ}\right|+\left|\overrightarrow {QZ}\right| (reverse-triangle inequality)
from the Law of [Hyperbolic] Cosines [in simpler notation]:
OZ^2=(OQ^2+QZ^2+2\ OQ\ QZ\ \cosh\theta_{OQ,QZ}) \ \geq \ ( OQ^2+QZ^2+2\ OQ\ QZ) = (|OQ|+|QZ|)^2

From the diagram, the daughter-masses are 4 and 4 (which satisfies 10 > 4 + 4).
You can check that
10^2= 4^2+ 4^2+ 2(4)(4)\cosh( {\rm arctanh}(3/5)-{\rm arctanh}(-3/5))
( https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=4^2++4^2++2(4)(4)cosh(+arctanh(3/5)+-+arctanh(-3/5))
)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K