Particle in an electric field- formulae suggestions.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle of charge q and rest mass m_0 being accelerated in a uniform electric field E. Participants are exploring the relativistic expression for the speed of the particle after a time t, as well as relevant equations and concepts related to relativistic motion and forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various equations related to kinetic energy and electric force, attempting to rearrange and substitute them. Questions arise about the physical meaning of certain expressions and the implications of the direction of the applied force.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and questioning each other's reasoning. There is an exploration of different interpretations of relativistic force equations and their applications to the problem at hand. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between momentum and velocity in relativistic contexts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of information regarding the direction of the applied force, which raises questions about which relativistic force expression to use. There is also mention of differing opinions on the concept of relativistic mass.

Alpha&Omega
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
1. A particle of charge q and rest mass m_0 is accelerated from rest at t=0 in a uniform electric field of magnitude E. All other forces are negligible in comparison to the electric field force. Show that after a time t the relativistic expression for the speed of the particle is:

v=\frac{c}{\sqrt{1+\frac{m_0^2c^2}{q^2E^2t^2}}}


Homework Equations



I think the equations relevant here have got to be E_k=(\gamma-1)m_0c^2 and E=\frac{F}{q}.

I've tried rearranging the above equations and substituting them into each other but I can't get anything good. Does anyone know any other useful equations that I might be able to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alpha&Omega! :smile:

(how come you have two different names? :confused:)
AlphaΩ2134104 said:
v=\frac{c}{\sqrt{1+\frac{m_0^2c^2}{q^2E^2t^2}}}

Does anyone know any other useful equations that I might be able to use?

Hint: with that v, what is (v/c)/√(1 - v2/c2) ? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Alpha&Omega! :smile:

(how come you have two different names? :confused:)


I felt insecure. XD

Hint: with that v, what is (v/c)/√(1 - v2/c2) ? :wink:

Do you mean as a physical quantity?

I would just do this:

\frac{\frac{v}{c}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

\sqrt{\frac{\frac{v^2}{c^2}}{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}

\sqrt{\frac{1}{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}-1

Is this what you meant? =S
 
No :biggrin:, I meant what is (v/c)/√(1 - v2/c2) if v=\frac{c}{\sqrt{1+\frac{m_0^2c^2}{q^2E^2t^2}}} ? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
No :biggrin:, I meant what is (v/c)/√(1 - v2/c2) if v=\frac{c}{\sqrt{1+\frac{m_0^2c^2}{q^2E^2t^2}}} ? :wink:

Ah, darn. Let me see:

\frac{{\frac{c}{\sqrt{1+\frac{m_0^2c^2}{q^2E^2t^2}}}}{c}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(\frac{c}{\sqrt{1+\frac{m_0^2c^2}{q^2E^2t^2}}})^2}{c^2}}}

\frac{{\frac{c^2}{\sqrt{1+\frac{m_0^2c^2}{q^2E^2t^2}}}}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(\frac{c^2}{{1+\frac{m_0^2c^2}{q^2E^2t^2}}})}{c^2}}}

\frac{{\frac{c^2}{\sqrt{1+\frac{m_0^2c^2}{q^2E^2t^2}}}}}{\sqrt{-\frac{m_0^2c62}{q^2E^2t^2}}}

Ummm, am I doing it correctly? I've got a complex number as the denominator! =S
 
uhhh? whadya do? :confused:

should be qEt/m0c :wink:
 
img040.jpg


magic!

This may sound weird, but how did you know to use \frac{\frac{v}{c}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}?
 
Because I knew that m0(v/c)/√(1 - v2/c2) is the … ? :smile:

(btw, it would have save a lot of paper and time if you'd written X, say, instead of that fraction! :wink:)
 
The momentum divided by c?

So if momentum is MeV/c then in this equation we have MeV/c2 which is the mass!

(I know it would have saved trees, but for some reason I decided to do it this long and complicated way =D).

So I have to work from this equation to the equation posted in the thread.

I just tried it and I noticed that the question doesn't mention whether the applied force is parallel to the x-axis or perpendicular to it. Which expression for relativistic force should I use?
 
  • #10
AlphaΩ2135742 said:
The momentum divided by c?

Yup! :biggrin:

So the question is asking you to prove that after time t the momentum is qEt …

what principle of physics would you use to do that? :wink:
I noticed that the question doesn't mention whether the applied force is parallel to the x-axis or perpendicular to it. Which expression for relativistic force should I use?


uhh? :confused: the x-axis is wherever you want it to be
 
  • #11
tiny-tim said:
Yup! :biggrin:

So the question is asking you to prove that after time t the momentum is qEt …

what principle of physics would you use to do that? :wink:

Would it be an integral of an expression for the force with respect to time?


uhh? :confused: the x-axis is wherever you want it to be


In my book it has two expressions for relativistic force. One is F=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}ma if it's perpendicular to the x-axis and the other is F=\frac{1}{(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})^\frac{3}{2}}ma if the force is in the same direction as the field.
 
  • #12
AlphaΩ2136138 said:
Would it be an integral of an expression for the force with respect to time?

I was thinking more along the lines of "Force = …"

(work backwards from the answer! :wink:)
In my book it has two expressions for relativistic force. One is F=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}ma if it's perpendicular to the x-axis and the other is F=\frac{1}{(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})^\frac{3}{2}}ma if the force is in the same direction as the field.

ah …
AlphaΩ2134104 said:
A particle of charge q and rest mass m_0 is accelerated from rest at t=0 in a uniform electric field of magnitude E.

so the velocity will always be in the same direction as E :smile:

btw, I don't normally approve of "relativistic mass", but in this case I find it easier to remember the equations as

Fperp = mrela

Fpara = mrela/(1 - v2/c2)

so I remember the perpendicular force equation as being the same as Newton's :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K