I Particle in free space - what happens to the wave function after measurement?

QuasarBoy543298
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
If I'm trying to solve the problem of a particle in free space (H = P2/2m ).
the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian cannot be normalized.
now assume I have a legitimate wave function expressed in terms of the eigenfunction of H and I want to measure its energy.
what will happen to the wavefunction after the measurement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot say this without telling which specific measurement device you use. What happens depends on the specific interaction of the measured system with the measurement device.

In your case of the free particle, you should note that there are no energy eigenstates in the literal sense, because the energy eigenstates are uniquely given by the common eigenstates of thee three momentum components, and these are plane waves. They are not square-integrable and thus belong not to the Hilbert space (in wave mechanics the space of square-integrable functions) but to the dual of the nuclear space, where position and momentum operators are defined, i.e., they are distributions.

True states, coming close to energy eigenstates are square-integrable wave functions which peak quite sharply in momentum space. You can, e.g., choose a Gaussian ##\tilde{\psi}_0(\vec{p}) \propto \exp[-(\vec{p}-\vec{p}_0)^2/(4 \sigma_p)]## as an initial state. Then the solution of the Schrödinger equation in momentum space simply is
$$\tilde{\psi}(t,\vec{p})=\exp \left (-\frac{\mathrm{i} \vec{p}^2}{2m \hbar} t \right) \tilde{\psi}_0(\vec{p}).$$
The position representation then follows by Fourier transformation
$$\psi(t,\vec{x})= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi \hbar}} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 p \tilde{\psi}(t,\vec{x}),$$
which is again a Gaussian, which now however is rather broad, and the position uncertainty increases with time.

Always the Heisenberg uncertainty relation holds,
$$\Delta x_j \Delta p_j \geq \hbar/2$$
for each position-vector and momentum component, ##j \in \{1,2,3\}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Heikki Tuuri
To measure the energy of a free particle, you have to measure its momentum p. If you describe the particle with a wave packet, and want to improve your knowledge of the momentum p of the particle, then the uncertainty in the location of the particle has to grow. The wave packet becomes wider.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top