Particle in one-dimensional harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a charged particle in the ground state of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator potential. The scenario describes the effects on the particle when the potential is suddenly switched off, prompting participants to explore the implications of this change on the particle's behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the evolution of the ground state wave function when the potential is removed, with some suggesting it becomes plane waves while others argue it remains Gaussian. Questions are raised about the implications of the sudden removal of the potential and how it affects the particle's motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their reasoning and questioning each other's interpretations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the wave function after the potential is switched off, and there is exploration of how to express the Gaussian wave function in terms of plane waves.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics, particularly the behavior of wave functions under changing potentials. There is a focus on the mathematical representation of the wave function and its implications for the particle's motion, with references to specific textbooks for further context.

Muthumanimaran
Messages
79
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


This is a question asked in a entrance examination[/B]
A charged particle is in the ground state of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator
potential, generated by electrical means. If the power is suddenly switched off, so that the
potential disappears, then, according to quantum mechanics,

Homework Equations


(a) the particle will shoot out of the well and move out towards infinity in one of the two
possible directions
(b) the particle will stop oscillating and as time increases it may be found farther and
farther away from the centre of the well
(c) the particle will keep oscillating about the same mean position but with increasing
amplitude as time increases
(d) the particle will undergo a transition to one of the higher excited states of the
harmonic oscillator

The Attempt at a Solution


My reasoning is When the potential is switched off, the particle is free, so it may be shoot out of the well and move towards infinity in one of the two possible directions. I don't know my reasoning is right, the option I choose is correct or not, please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Muthumanimaran said:
I don't know my reasoning is right, the option I choose is correct or not, please help
What is your reasoning here?I would take the ground state wave function and see how it evolves over time when the potential is zero.
 
NFuller said:
What is your reasoning here?I would take the ground state wave function and see how it evolves over time when the potential is zero.
The ground state wave function is gaussian, when the potential is switched off the particle is free and wavefunction becomes plane waves, so the plane waves must move towards either one of the directions to infinity right?
 
Muthumanimaran said:
The ground state wave function is gaussian, when the potential is switched off the particle is free and wavefunction becomes plane waves, so the plane waves must move towards either one of the directions to infinity right?
One more problem is that the potential is not gradually switched off, it is suddenly switched off.
 
Muthumanimaran said:
when the potential is switched off the particle is free and wavefunction becomes plane waves, so the plane waves must move towards either one of the directions to infinity right?
The wave function does not become a plane wave when the potential is switched off. It remains a Gaussian at that time. The Guassian can be written in terms of plane waves however since they form a complete basis for a free particle. You should study how these plane waves behave as a function of time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Muthumanimaran
Muthumanimaran said:
My reasoning is When the potential is switched off, the particle is free, so it may be shoot out of the well and move towards infinity in one of the two possible directions. I don't know my reasoning is right, the option I choose is correct or not, please help

After the binding force is removed, the ##|\Psi (x,t)|^2## behaves like a solution of the heat conduction equation does for a Gaussian initial condition.
 
NFuller said:
The wave function does not become a plane wave when the potential is switched off. It remains a Gaussian at that time. The Guassian can be written in terms of plane waves however since they form a complete basis for a free particle. You should study how these plane waves behave as a function of time.
I got it. If I write gaussian in the free particle basis the coefficient of the basis (Fourier transform of gaussian) becomes another gaussian (but a broad one), the probability of finding the particle is mod squared of coefficient, so option B is correct not A. The particle will stop oscillating and as time increases it may be found farther and farther away from the centre of the well
 
hilbert2 said:
After the binding force is removed, the ##|\Psi (x,t)|^2## behaves like a solution of the heat conduction equation does for a Gaussian initial condition.
Right, this is the "clever" way to go about this.
Muthumanimaran said:
I got it. If I write gaussian in the free particle basis the coefficient of the basis (Fourier transform of gaussian) becomes another gaussian (but a broad one), the probability of finding the particle is mod squared of coefficient, so option B is correct not A. The particle will stop oscillating and as time increases it may be found farther and farther away from the centre of the well
Yes, there are technically two Fourier transforms that need to be done here but the end result will be a Gaussian which broadens with time. Also, I'm not sure what textbook you are using, but this is almost exactly the same as problem 2.22 in Griffith's QM book.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K