Particle is located a distance x meters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jbreezy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the work done on a particle subjected to a force described by the function cos(πx/3) Newtons, as it moves from x = 1 to x = 2 meters. Participants are interpreting the implications of positive and negative work in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of work done in segments, particularly around the point where the force changes sign. Questions arise about how to account for negative work and whether it should be treated as positive in the overall calculation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of work done in the context of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculation of total work, emphasizing the distinction between positive and negative contributions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the physical implications of work done in relation to the graph of the force function, and there is an ongoing debate about how to handle areas above and below the x-axis in the integral calculation.

Jbreezy
Messages
582
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When a particle is located a distance x meters from the origin, a force of cos(PIx/3) Newtons acts on it. How much work is done in moving the particle from x = 1 to x =2? Interpret your answer by considering the work done from x =1 to x = 1.5 and from x = 1.5 to x = 2


Homework Equations



So the integral isn't a problem.
If you graph this function I'm sure you know the sign change where cos(pix/3) dips below the x-axis at 1.5. I'm just wondering if I should give my answer as the sum of the neg work and positive work. If the work is negative doesn't it mean it is on the opposite direction? But I still say oh this has done. Neg + pos work

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since they are talking about "work" I think they expect a more "physical" explanation. Here, you are doing work from x= 1 to x= 3/2 but then works is being done from x= 3/2 to 2. It's like doing work to push an object to the top of a hill, then getting work out by allowing the object to run down the other side.
 
Ah so rolling a rock up a hill and letting it roll the other side? Do I consider the negative work as positive so I add the area above the graph and the area below for total work?
 
No, you do NOT "consider the negative work as positive". The total work done is the "area above the graph minus the area below the graph"- in other words precisely [itex]\int_1^2 f(x)dx[/itex]
 
Yeah so you do no work then with this problem. The integrals are equal above and below
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K