Understanding Particle Superposition in the Schrodinger Equation

karkas
Messages
131
Reaction score
1
Hello, 've been progressing through my self-studying of the Schrodinger Equation in both its time-dependent and independent forms, and I have come across an unknown term.

Super Position ( in my book it's translated in greek literally superposition = υπέρθεση)

My guess so far is that a superposition is when a particle is described by two wavefunctions, which happen to be two eigenfunctions \psi_nwith the same (perhaps with different, {not sure there} ) eigenvalues En. Am I correct? If not, please enlighten me :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think "Linear Combination of Wavefunctions" was the term I was looking for, eh?
 
karkas said:
I think "Linear Combination of Wavefunctions" was the term I was looking for, eh?

The term you are looking for is "linear combination of Energy eigenstates." For example, take the case of a particle in a 1D box of width L. The energy eigenfunctions are:

\phi_n = A sin(\frac{n \pi x}{L})

Where A is a normalization factor. Just because a particle is in this box, does not mean that it is one of the states, those are only the states with definite well defined energy. A particle could be in a super position of energy eigenstates:

\psi= B sin(\frac{\pi x}{L}) + C sin(\frac{2 \pi x}{L})

where a condition on B and C is to normalize the wavefunction, as usual. Notice that the two states which are involved are the n = 1 state (the B term) and the n = 2 state (the C term). Now when we measure the energy of a particle in this state we do not know whether
you will get n = 1 or n = 2 but we can calculuate the probabiity of either!
 
Thank you! Really nice explanation there!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top