Parts Per Thousand & Gradients Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomtomtom1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    parts Per
AI Thread Summary
The equation Y = -0.00331x + 9907.333 describes a linear relationship between distance (x) and elevation (y), with a gradient of -0.003311. To convert this gradient into parts per thousand, it indicates that for every 1,000 units moved in the x plane, the elevation changes by -3.311 units in the y plane. The discussion clarifies that parts per thousand refers to movement in the y plane relative to movement in the x plane. Therefore, for every 1,000 units in the x direction, the corresponding change in the y direction is -3.311. Understanding this conversion is crucial for interpreting gradients in practical applications.
tomtomtom1
Messages
160
Reaction score
8
Hello all

I was wondering if anyone could help me with the following:-

The equation of a line is Y = -0.00331x + 9907.333.

The equation represents distance (x) and elevation (y)

The gradient is -0.003311. What is number represents is for every 1 unit I move in the x plane I move -0.003311 in the y plane.

My question is how do I convert -0.003311 into parts per thousand?

Does part per thousand mean for every 1000 units I move in the x plane how much do I move in the y plane or does it mean for every 1000 units I move in the y plane, how much do I move in the x plane??

Can anyone help?

Thank you in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tomtomtom1 said:
My question is how do I convert -0.003311 into parts per thousand?

Does part per thousand mean for every 1000 units I move in the x plane how much do I move in the y plane or does it mean for every 1000 units I move in the y plane, how much do I move in the x plane??
It's the former.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top