Passengers in a falling plane, author request

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Govicide
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling Plane Request
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of passengers in a falling plane, specifically a scenario involving a G6 jet in a nosedive at a 45-degree angle. Participants explore the potential experiences of passengers, including their movements and sensations during the dive and subsequent pull-out, considering factors like acceleration and g-forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the experiences of unbuckled passengers during a nosedive, questioning whether they would be weightless, tumble towards the cockpit, hit the ceiling, or be forced toward the back of the plane.
  • Another participant suggests that the experience might be similar to a roller coaster ride, noting that significant g-forces capable of throwing passengers around would likely exceed the structural limits of a civilian aircraft.
  • A different viewpoint indicates that the initial phase of the dive could produce 0 or negative g-forces, allowing passengers to float, but that they would be pushed back into their seats as the dive continues at a 45-degree angle.
  • One participant challenges a previous claim about the "Vomit Comet," arguing that a commercial jet could withstand g-forces similar to those experienced during its pull-out from a dive, while also referencing historical incidents of severe turbulence in aircraft.
  • Another participant agrees that achieving weightlessness in a 45-degree dive is unlikely, suggesting that the "Vomit Comet" achieves this through a parabolic flight path rather than a constant dive.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the physics involved in the scenario, particularly regarding the g-forces experienced and the potential for passengers to be thrown around the cabin. There is no consensus on the exact experiences of passengers during the dive and pull-out.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific assumptions about the aircraft's design and structural integrity, as well as the dynamics of the dive and pull-out maneuvers. The discussion highlights the complexity of the scenario and the variability in passenger experiences based on different conditions.

Govicide
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm an author and I want to correctly portray a scene (with a bit of artistic license) in my next book. However, I don't think I understand the physics of the situation.

Scenario: Passengers flying in a G6 going 450mph at 35,000 feet. Jet goes into a nosedive at let's say a 45 degree angle, wings level. The jet accelerates towards the ground in its fall. What would the passengers experience? Would they tumble toward the cockpit if they were unbuckled? Would they be weightless? Would they hit the ceiling? Would they be forced toward the back of the plane due to the acceleration? Would it be a combination of all of these and more? If so, what would the order be?

And, if the jet pulls out of the dive, what would be the forces on the passengers? Once again, into their seats? Heads against the ceiling? Etc. . . .

Thanks in advance . . .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google the NASA "Vomit comet". Also on youtube.
 
To a rough approximation, tale a ride on a roller coaster, and transfer what you feel to the aircraft cabin situation.

If you are talking about a civilian passenger aircraft, any g forces big enough to "throw people around the passenger cabin" would be likely to make the wings fall off. Civil aircraft aren't designed to do aerobatics.

If any passengers were out of their seats and walking around, they might well fall over if they didn't grab hold of something to steady themselves, but that's probably about as "violent" as it would get.

The "vomit comet" is a very special case, because it is deliberately flown to maintain zero gravity for a short time. That wouldn't happen "by chance".
 
Govicide said:
Scenario: Passengers flying in a G6 going 450mph at 35,000 feet. Jet goes into a nosedive at let's say a 45 degree angle, wings level. The jet accelerates towards the ground in its fall.
The begin of the dive might produce 0 or negative g-forces, so people would float around. This depend how quickly the nose goes down. Once diving in a straight line at 45 you are pushed mainly into the seats again, with some forward-backward-variation depending how fast you gain speed.
 
Alephzero - I dissagree. The Vomit Comet only generates about 1.8g pulling pull out of it's dive. Somthing a commercial jet should easily withstand.

When I was a child I flew in a turboprop aircraft that experienced sufficient -ve g for drinking glasses to hit the ceiling. Clear air turbulence is ocasionally severe enough to cause death and severe injury - one website says that between 1981 and 1997 there were 342 reports of severe turbulence during which 3 passengers died and there were 80 serious injuries (usually taken to mean broken limbs). The aircraft usually survives to make a safe landing even if damaged to the point that they are later written off.

I believe the main problem with doing it deliberately is excess air speed. You can't produce zero g for long without building up excess speed and that might cause structural damage.

I agree with A.T. - If you want to make people weightless a 45 degree dive isn't going to do it because I doubt a jet could continue to accelerate fast enough like that. The vomit comet flies a parabolic path - it can generate weightless conditions even while climbing.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
90
Views
13K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K