Passive Absorption of Quinine in Stomach vs Ileum

  • Thread starter Thread starter casio1990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absorption Stomach
AI Thread Summary
Quinine, an antimalarial drug with a pKa of 8.4, is more likely to be absorbed in the ileum (pH ≈ 8) than in the stomach (pH = 0.9) due to its ionization properties. At a pH close to its pKa, quinine exists in a non-ionized form, which facilitates passive diffusion through lipid membranes. In contrast, the acidic environment of the stomach causes quinine to become protonated and ionized, hindering absorption. The discussion emphasizes the importance of pH and pKa in drug absorption, noting that while some absorption occurs in the stomach, the intestines are generally more effective for drug uptake. Overall, the ileum provides a more favorable environment for quinine absorption than the stomach.
casio1990
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The antimalarial drug quinine has pka = 8.4; is it likely to be absorbed by passive diffusion through lipid membranes in the stomach (ph = 0.9) or ileum (ph \approx 8)? Why?


Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



If the pH of the environment is equal to the pKa of the substance, then the substance will be ionized by 50%. Beyond that, I am unsure what the effect will be if the pH environment differs from that of the pKa. Strictly looking at the question from a chemistry viewpoint, I think that passive diffusion of quinine will more likely be absorbed in the ileum since the pKa and pH are close. On the other hand, I think that's a too large of an assumption to make since the differences between 8.4 and 8 are considerable. Biologically speaking, it would make more sense that passive diffusion of quinine should occur more readily at the ileum since the intestines are able to facilitate absorption better than in the stomach. While some absorption does takes place in the stomach, I don't think it compares to the intestines.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi casio1990,

I think you should revert back to the Henderson-Hasselbach equation to solve this one. The equation can tell you the percentage of non-ionised to ionised forms of the drug in the medium. However, you need to know if it is an acidic drug or a basic drug to calculate the percentages.

I think that quinine is as base so if the pH of the medium is bigger than the pKa of the drug then there will be more of the non-ionised form than the ionised form. If the pH of the medium is smaller than the drug then the ionised form of the drug dominates and less of the drug is absorbed.

Moreover, remember that passive diffusion is dependent accordingly to the factors of Fick's Law and the relative hydrophobocity of the drug. Also, the drug can only traverse through the epithelial cells in the gut when it is non-ionised. Diffusion cannot take place if the drug is ionised because it is unable to penetrate the cell wall. In the case of quinine above, it is more likely for it to be absorbed in the ileum than the stomach because when it is in the stomach it will protonate and be ionised.

"Strictly looking at the question from a chemistry viewpoint, I think that passive diffusion of quinine will more likely be absorbed in the ileum since the pKa and pH are close."

I don't think so. There are some drugs where there only a small difference in pH and pKa but there are large changes in their form composition in the medium.

"Biologically speaking, it would make more sense that passive diffusion of quinine should occur more readily at the ileum since the intestines are able to facilitate absorption better than in the stomach. While some absorption does takes place in the stomach, I don't think it compares to the intestines."

True, but remember some drugs are highly acidic like acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin). More of it is absorbed in the stomach than in the intestine. It is important for you to consider the pH and pKa factors in absorption also.

~silentelysium
 
Thanks for your help!

Your hints gave me a better understanding of the question.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
50K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top