Pattern recognition on integrals questions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of pattern recognition in solving integral problems, specifically focusing on rewriting numerators in integrals and understanding the reasoning behind such manipulations. The context includes mathematical reasoning and techniques related to integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the procedure for rewriting the numerator of an integral, specifically asking where the constant 3 comes from in the expression (2x-2) + 3.
  • Another participant suggests that completing the square in the denominator allows for a change of variables and provides a rewritten form of the integral.
  • A later reply clarifies that the number 3 is derived from the need to adjust the numerator to maintain the original value of +1 when rewriting -2 as -2 + 3.
  • There is a discussion about whether the numerator can be changed or simply rewritten, indicating some uncertainty about the manipulation of the integral's components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the manipulation of the integral's numerator, with some confusion remaining about the constants involved. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the clarity of these manipulations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the treatment of constants in the numerator and the implications of rewriting terms in integrals. The discussion reflects differing interpretations of how to approach these mathematical transformations.

Dan350
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hello users,
I would like to know when do you use pattern recognition over integrals
Someone told me it was that
For example the integral below

I would like to know the procedure to rewrite the numerators as (2x-2) + 3
Where does the 3 come from?
I would really appreciate

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_31 Jul. 03 11.13.jpg
    ScreenHunter_31 Jul. 03 11.13.jpg
    1.6 KB · Views: 473
Physics news on Phys.org
Pattern recognition is at the heart of mathematics no matter which branch of math you're dealing with. In this case, you can complete the square in the denominator. Rewriting the numerator the way you've mentioned then makes the squared term in the denominator appear in the numerator. Then you can try a change of variables. You get:
[tex]\int \frac{2x+1}{(x-1)^{2}-3}\,dx = \int \frac{(2x-2)+3}{(x-1)^{2}-3}\,dx<br /> =\int \frac{2(x-1)+3}{(x-1)^{2}-3} \, dx.[/tex]
Substitute [itex]u=x-1[/itex] to simplify.
 
Ackbeet said:
Pattern recognition is at the heart of mathematics no matter which branch of math you're dealing with. In this case, you can complete the square in the denominator. Rewriting the numerator the way you've mentioned then makes the squared term in the denominator appear in the numerator. Then you can try a change of variables. You get:
[tex]\int \frac{2x+1}{(x-1)^{2}-3}\,dx = \int \frac{(2x-2)+3}{(x-1)^{2}-3}\,dx<br /> =\int \frac{2(x-1)+3}{(x-1)^{2}-3} \, dx.[/tex]
Substitute [itex]u=x-1[/itex] to simplify.
Makes sense,, thank you,, but could you explain me how did you get the number 3 in the numerator??
I know that the integral is in the form f'(x)/f(x),, but what do you do with the constant?
I am a little confused
 
Last edited:
Dan350 said:
Makes sense,, thank you,, but could you explain me how did you get the number 3 in the numerator?? I am a little confused

Sure. You can't actually change the numerator, can you? You can rewrite it to look a little different, but that's all. The [itex]3[/itex] in the numerator is the number you must add to [itex]-2[/itex] in order to ensure that you end up with the original [itex]+1[/itex]. So the thinking goes this way: I want a [itex]-2[/itex] there, but I have a [itex]+1[/itex]. How could I get a [itex]-2[/itex]? By rewriting [itex]1=-2+3[/itex]. So that's where the [itex]3[/itex] comes from.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K