PCAT Variance Qs: Range of Scores & Similar Mean Values?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohamma1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Studying
mohamma1
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm studying for the PCAT and have come across a few variance questions. I feel like they are just oversimplying the heck out variance. I'll post one of the latest questions ...

[PLAIN]http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/1875/32561537.jpg

The explanation they give is because Class A has a larger range of scores (19 vs. 17) it "suggests" that the variation is greater. I really don't think they want me to find the expected value and then subtract each score from that and then square it and w/e else to find the exact variance. So is just looking at a range of scores a decent rule of thumb to compare variation between different data groups? Or would I need some pre-req like they atleast need to have similar mean values?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


mohamma1 said:
The explanation they give is because Class A has a larger range of scores (19 vs. 17) it "suggests" that the variation is greater. I really don't think they want me to find the expected value and then subtract each score from that and then square it and w/e else to find the exact variance. So is just looking at a range of scores a decent rule of thumb to compare variation between different data groups? Or would I need some pre-req like they atleast need to have similar mean values?

I don't like the terminology used in this example. It is confusing. Variance (SD^2) is a formal, well defined calculation. Range is not used that much in statistics but it's understood to be the difference between the extreme values of a sample. To lump them into a single term "variation" is a bad idea IMO.

In the example A obviously has the greater range and B the greater SD. Why confuse people with a term like "variation". At least a definition of someone's idea of what "variation" is should be provided.
 
Last edited:


Yea, I completely agree. The worse part is this is an official PCAT practice, and they say 80% of the questions were on old exams so I'd be screwed if it was on the real test. Are there any good general rules I can use to find variance by just look at a set of data or graph.
 
Last edited:


mohamma1 said:
Yea, I completely agree. The worse part is this is an official PCAT practice, and they say 80% of the questions were on old exams. Are they are good general rules I can use to find variance by just look at a set of data or graph.

In comparing two samples can you sometimes judge which sample has the larger variance by inspecting the data point dispersion. Otherwise you just have to calculate it. It's also difficult to judge the effect of outliers just by inspection. If you look at data point printouts enough you get a feel for it, but there's no general rule other than calculating it IMO.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top