[PChem] Maxwell-Boltzmann Molecule Mean Speed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of calculating the mean speed of molecules using the Maxwell-Boltzmann speed distribution. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of the mean speed as an integral involving the speed and the distribution function, addressing the interpretation and implications of this integration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how integrating the product of speed and the distribution function leads to an average speed, questioning the underlying reasoning.
  • Another participant clarifies that the integral of the function "f(v)" equals one, while the integral of "v*f(v)" is what is being evaluated to find the mean speed.
  • A participant describes the integral as a weighted average, suggesting that the function "f(v)" serves as the weight in this context.
  • One participant attempts to relate the concept to a simpler example involving rolling a die, explaining the calculation of an expected value without using integrals.
  • Another participant acknowledges their initial confusion about the equation for mean speed, ultimately recognizing it as a definition rather than an arbitrary formula.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical formulation of the mean speed but express differing levels of understanding regarding the interpretation of the integral and the concept of a weighted average. The discussion remains unresolved in terms of fully clarifying these concepts for all participants.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note ambiguity in terminology, particularly regarding the term "weighted average" and its applicability in this context. There is also a recognition of the need for clearer explanations or examples to aid understanding.

Coop
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am having trouble with this concept...

"A mean speed (c) is calculated by multiplying each speed by the fraction of molecules that have that speed, and then adding all the products together. When the speed varies over a continuous range, the sum is replaced by an integral. To employ this approach here, we note that the fraction of molecules with a speed in the range v to v + dv is f(v)dv, so the product of this fraction and the speed is vf(v)dv. The mean speed is obtained by evaluating the integral

c=\int vf(v)dv."

This passage is dealing with the M-B Speed Distribution. So integrating the function would give you the probability of finding a molecule with the speed between the lower and upper bounds, correct? So if you just took the integral of the function with no bounds it should be equal to one. I am having trouble seeing why integrating the product of the function and the speed leads to an average...

...Could anyone try and clear this up for me?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The integral over the function "f(v)" would equal one. What you integrate here is the function "v*f(v)".
 
Timo said:
The integral over the function "f(v)" would equal one. What you integrate here is the function "v*f(v)".

Yes sorry, I see that my wording was ambiguous. I am having trouble seeing why integrating v*f(v) gives you an average.
 
Coop said:
Yes sorry, I see that my wording was ambiguous. I am having trouble seeing why integrating v*f(v) gives you an average.
If f(x) is a probability distribution then the integral over x*f(x) pretty much is the definition of the average, mean, or expectancy value of the property x. Not sure what I can do to help you understanding it. Maybe an example that does not explicity use an integral: Rolling a dice has an equal probability 1/6 for each side of the dice. The expectancy value is <x> = 1*1/6 + 2*1/6 +3*1/6 + 4*1/6 +5*1/6 + 6*1/6 = \sum_{i=1}^6 i * p(i), with p(i) being the probability for event/value i.

I am not sure that emphasizing "weighted average" really helps understanding (but this thread has a chance to prove me wrong). Technically, the integral over x*f(x) is a weighted average of x with f(x) being the weights. But in my experience the term "weighted average" is only used when a sensible "unweighted average" would exist, which is not the case here (there is no point in or sensible meaning of "the average real number").
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks for following up :). Yes, I was confused at where the integral c=∫vf(v)dv was coming from (I don't like using random equations which I don't know where they came from) but I figured out it was pretty much just a definition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
599
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
929
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K