PDE with an inequality constrain

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackTulip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Pde
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the elliptic partial differential equation (PDE) Δu - k * u = 0, subject to the inequality constraints 0 ≤ u(x,y) ≤ 1.0, where k is a positive constant. Participants suggest using the method of separation of variables to derive a general solution, but note the challenge of characterizing solutions that meet the specified bounds. A potential approach involves substituting u with a function constrained within the desired range, such as u = exp(-v²), although the feasibility of this substitution for solving the PDE remains uncertain.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the method of separation of variables
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions, specifically Dirichlet boundary conditions
  • Experience with function substitution techniques in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the method of separation of variables for elliptic PDEs
  • Explore techniques for handling inequality constraints in PDEs
  • Study Dirichlet boundary conditions and their implications on solutions
  • Investigate function substitution methods, particularly for bounded solutions
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, mathematicians, and engineers working on elliptic PDEs, particularly those dealing with inequality constraints and boundary conditions.

BlackTulip
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

For part of my research, I need to solve an elliptic PDE like:

Δu - k * u = 0,

subject to : 0≤ u(x,y) ≤ 1.0

where k is a positive constant.



Can anyone tell me how I can solve this problem?


Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean ∇2u - k*u = 0?
 
Well, the usual approach is separation of variables to obtain a general solution. Normally one has completely specified boundary conditions, whereas you only have bounds, so there will be multiple solutions, and its not obvious how to characterise those that satisfy the bounds. Is that where you're stuck?
 
I do have some Dirichlet boundary conditions. My problem is that how to formulate this PDE with some inequality constraints. Do you have a suggestion for that?

Thanks for your attention.
 
No idea if this is feasible, but how if you were to replace u by a function that could only be in that range, e.g. substitute u = exp(-v2)? Tricky part might be finding such a substitution that still allows you to solve the PDE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K