B Peculiar View of Density Matrices: Is There a Problem?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Heidi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Matrices
Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
Hi Pfs , happy new year.
I wonder if there is a problem with the manner i see density matrices:
I use to consider them without a statistical point of view , just like i do with Hilbert vectors. no more no less. So the points on the Block sphere are only pecular points of those which are inside.
Of course if they can also describe mixtures of pure states in a statistical point of view.
is there a problem with that point of view?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As for the titled question, I think yes because I have no idea for information to add to density matrix.
 
Heidi said:
Hi Pfs , happy new year.
I wonder if there is a problem with the manner i see density matrices:
I use to consider them without a statistical point of view , just like i do with Hilbert vectors. no more no less. So the points on the Block sphere are only pecular points of those which are inside.
Of course if they can also describe mixtures of pure states in a statistical point of view.
is there a problem with that point of view?
Could you give an example? Density matrices are used in more than one context, some of which might be more complete than others.
 
The quantum state of an arbitrary system is described by the statistical operator ##\hat{\rho}##, which is a positive semidefinite self-adjoint operator with trace 1. It's a pure state, if it can be written as ##\hat{\rho}=|\psi \rangle \langle \psi|## with some normalized vector ##|\psi \rangle##, i.e., iff ##\hat{\rho}^2=\hat{\rho}##.
 
  • Like
Likes physicsworks
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
641
Replies
42
Views
6K
Back
Top