Peltier cell in series both electrically and thermally

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the configuration of Peltier cells, specifically the idea of connecting them both electrically and thermally in series. While typically connected electrically in series and thermally in parallel, the proposal suggests cascading them at the cell level rather than the module level. Concerns are raised about the potential for one cell to underperform or fail due to differing resistances and current demands. The conversation highlights the importance of thermal insulation between layers and the limitations imposed by maximum temperature differences per module. Overall, the feasibility of this configuration raises questions about efficiency and design considerations in thermoelectric cooling systems.
askingask
Messages
90
Reaction score
5
IMG_1820.jpeg


So here you can see the basics behind a thermocouple.


IMG_1818.png

What people usually do, is that they connect these junctions electrically in series and thermally in parallel.


IMG_1819.jpeg


Now another thing people do is cascading several peltier modules.


image.jpg

Now my thought was, why not connect them electrically in series and thermally also in series directly like shown above?
That way you cascade them on a cell level instead of on a module level.

I know that there is a reason why when the modules are cascaded the modules get bigger and bigger towards the warm end to effectively cool each stage.

What do you think about that idea and do you have any reference I could look in to?
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
I’m not an expert on this stuff by any stretch of the imagination, but I think running them in series electrically is going to either fry one, or cause one to severely underperform. I suspect they have different resistances and current demands, but will require similar voltages.
 
Flyboy said:
I’m not an expert on this stuff by any stretch of the imagination, but I think running them in series electrically is going to either fry one, or cause one to severely underperform. I suspect they have different resistances and current demands, but will require similar voltages.
They are actually usually connected in series. The peltier modules shown above are connected in series. That itself isn‘t interesting, the interesting part is them being thermally in series as opposed to being thermally in parallel like the peltier modules shown above.
 
askingask said:
I know that there is a reason why when the modules are cascaded the modules get bigger and bigger towards the warm end to effectively cool each stage.

What do you think about that idea and do you have any reference I could look in to?
The limitation is on the thermal insulation that is required between each layer of Peltier junctions. You must build colder insulated spaces inside cooler insulated spaces, like those Russian dolls.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matryoshka_doll

Even with perfect peripheral insulation, there is a maximum temperature difference possible per module. That is determined by the maximum current, since that must provide for the thermal conduction, backwards through the Peltier module itself.

Your first reference should be ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_cooling
 
askingask said:
Now my thought was, why not connect them electrically in series and thermally also in series directly like shown above?
That way you cascade them on a cell level instead of on a module level.
The modules themselves are already a combination of series and parallel connections on junction level: the 12V (or other convenient) operating voltage is the result of that.

You can add further elements in series, but you need to match current: you can add more parallel, but then you should match voltages (that's what happens on that pyramid-stack on the picture).
 
Rive said:
The modules themselves are already a combination of series and parallel connections on junction level: the 12V (or other convenient) operating voltage is the result of that.

You can add further elements in series, but you need to match current: you can add more parallel, but then you should match voltages (that's what happens on that pyramid-stack on the picture).
You mean electrically?
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top