Perfect fluid, stress energy tensor in the rest frame,

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the stress-energy tensor of a perfect fluid in different motion scenarios. In the rest frame of the fluid, the tensor is represented as diag(ρ, P, 0, 0) where ρ is the energy density and P is the pressure. When particles in the fluid move uniformly, the tensor changes to diag(ρ, p, 0, 0), where p denotes momentum density. The implications of particle motion on spacetime structure are also explored, emphasizing that General Relativity treats these scenarios classically, limiting improbable particle behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stress-energy tensors in General Relativity
  • Familiarity with perfect fluid dynamics
  • Knowledge of energy density and pressure in relativistic contexts
  • Basic concepts of geodesics and spacetime structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the stress-energy tensor for perfect fluids in General Relativity
  • Explore the implications of anisotropic pressure in cosmological models
  • Learn about the continuum limit in particle physics
  • Investigate the effects of uniform motion on spacetime metrics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in General Relativity, cosmologists, and students studying fluid dynamics in relativistic frameworks.

Cusp
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
If I had a perfect fluid I could write the stress energy tensor in the rest frame of the fluid as a nice diagonal tensor with [rho,p,p,p] and use this to solve the field equations.

Pressure is just random internal motions, so what happens if all the particles in my perfect fluid decide to move to the left? Clearly, now I could transofrm into a rest frame with T=[rho,0,0,0] and this would suggest that the resulting spacetime structure we get would be different?

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If all the particles move left, they must be under the influence of a strong field which would certainly have changed the space-time.

But if you moved along the same geodesic as the particles then you would observe T=[rho,0,0,0].

It's unlikely this could happen in reality - not outside star trek.
 
I'm not positive I understand the question. I think what you may be trying to ask is this:

Suppose we have a swarm of particles

-> -> ->
<- <- <-

in the rest frame of the particles, half of them move to the left with velocity v and half move to the right with velocity v. What is the stress energy tensor for this swarm of particles in the continuum limit?

The answer will be that it is of the form diag(rho, P, 0, 0). P here represents an anisotropic pressure, i.e.

[tex] \left[<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> <br /> \rho&0&0&0\\<br /> 0&P&0&0\\<br /> 0&0&0&0\\<br /> 0&0&0&0\\<br /> <br /> \end{array}<br /> \right][/tex]You may be asking instead:

Suppose we have a swarm of particles, all of which move with a uniform velocity v to the right. What is the stress energy tensor of this swarm of particles in the continuum limit?

The answer to this is

[tex] \left[<br /> \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> <br /> \rho&p&0&0\\<br /> p&0&0&0\\<br /> 0&0&0&0\\<br /> 0&0&0&0\\<br /> <br /> \end{array}<br /> \right][/tex]

here p (not capitalized) is a momentum density rather than a pressure

Note that GR is presented as a classical theory, so you can't have the particles "decide" to do something improbable, if that was the point of your question.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K