Perimeter and area - need explanation

PeteCA
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dimensions of rectangle are a=2 and b=5.

Perimeter and area P=2a+2b=14 and A=a*b=10

If we take a rope of length l=14m, encircle the rectangle and connect the ends we will have the same perimeter.

Now we take this rope and make circle of it, this circle will have the same perimeter of rectangle P=14.

Radius is r=(14)/(2*pi)= 2.228

Area of circle will be A=r*r*pi=2.228*2.228*pi=15.597

Why area of circle A=15.597 is not the same as area of rectangle A=10 ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Because area is not the same as perimeter. Take that circle of yours and crush it flat (well, almost; you can't really crush it into a line...); it now has ~zero area and the same perimeter. Incidentally, it's possible for a figure to have finite volume and an infinite perimeter.
 
Then why is land mesured in area and not perimeter, every mesure will give different results.

Is there a formula or easy way to mesure land if boundaries are like potato.
 
Last edited:
PeteCA said:
Then why is land mesured in area and not perimeter, every mesure will give different results.

Is there a formula or easy way to mesure land if boundaries are like potato.

Because no one cares what the perimeter is, and no one wants to end up buying property with zero square feet because some sales rep was clever in advertising the place.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top