Period of oscillation (potential energy equation given)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the period of small oscillations for a particle whose potential energy is defined by the equation U(x) = U0(1-cos(ax)). The context is centered around oscillatory motion and the characteristics of potential energy functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equilibrium position and the nature of the forces involved. There are questions regarding the integration of the potential energy function and its relevance to forced oscillations. Some participants reference conditions for simple harmonic motion and suggest using approximations for small angles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the potential energy function and its implications for oscillatory motion. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions for simple harmonic motion, while additional questions about a second part of the problem have been raised, indicating a multi-faceted exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem consists of two parts, with the second part introducing a different potential energy equation, U(x) = a/x² - b/x, which raises questions about forming its differential equation. There is an acknowledgment of the need for further clarification on the nature of the oscillations described.

sodaboy7
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let the potential energy of particle depend upon coordinate x as:
U(x) = U0(1-cos(ax)). Where "U0" and "a" are constants. Find the period of small oscillations that particle performs about its equilibrium position.

2. Given Answer

T = 2∏√(m/a2U0)

The Attempt at a Solution



It can be seen from the equation that equilibrium will be at x = 0, where forces acting are zero. Also after integrating the equation with dx, it is seen that the motion is relevant to forced oscillations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
U(x) is the potential function. Why do you integrate it?
The motion is not forced oscillation. For that, an external time dependent force is needed.

ehild
 
There a two sufficient conditions to prove something is simple harmonic oscillator
F = -kx
or
Etotal = \frac{1}{2}Av2+\frac{1}{2}Bq2. Where A and B are some constants and, q is some coordinate (in your case ax). Then the period is T = 2π√(A/B) Also since it says small oscillations, I would use the small angle approximation for cosine.
 
therealnihl said:
Etotal = \frac{1}{2}Av2+\frac{1}{2}Bq2. Where A and B are some constants and, q is some coordinate (in your case ax). Then the period is T = 2π√(A/B) Also since it says small oscillations, I would use the small angle approximation for cosine.

Thanks for that. But this questions has two parts which I didn't mention.
The part-2 of the problem has the equation:
U(x)= a/x2 - b/x
How to deal with this one ?
I mean in above equation x has powers -2 and -1. So how to form its differential equation?
 
Well assuming the kinetic energy is of the form: \frac{1}{2}mv2, the the period for small oscillations is 2π√(k/m) where, k is the second derivative of the potential energy function evaluated at the equilibrium position (you might have to take the limit as it goes to the equilibrium position in this case...)
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
997
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K