Periodic Function: cos(x^2) & cos(\sqrt[2]{x})

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caesar_Rahil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Periodic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the periodicity of the functions cos(x^2) and cos(√x). Participants explore whether these functions exhibit periodic behavior and inquire about the criteria for determining periodicity in general.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the periodicity of cos(x^2) and cos(√x), with some asserting that neither function is periodic. Others discuss the general criteria for periodicity, including the condition f(x + α) = f(x) for some α.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various interpretations of periodicity, with some participants providing reasoning and examples to support their views. There is an exploration of the implications of periodicity and the nature of functions that may or may not be periodic.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and implications of periodic functions, leading to a deeper examination of specific cases and examples. The conversation reflects a mix of established knowledge and exploratory reasoning.

Caesar_Rahil
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
periodic question??

is cos (x^2) a periodic function,
also tell about cos([tex]\sqrt[2]{x}[/tex])

and what's its period if it is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither are periodic.
 
In general, how do we tell if a given function is periodic?
 
If for some [tex]\alpha[/tex] and any [tex]x[/tex], [tex]f(x+\alpha)=f(x)[/tex], then [tex]f[/tex] is periodic with period [tex]\alpha[/tex]
 
Yes, I'm pretty sure anyone who understands what a periodic function is would know that. I was asking how do we know if for some function f(x), there exists [tex]\alpha[/tex] such that [tex]f(x+\alpha) = f(x)[/tex]?
 
Defennder said:
Yes, I'm pretty sure anyone who understands what a periodic function is would know that. I was asking how do we know if for some function f(x), there exists [tex]\alpha[/tex] such that [tex]f(x+\alpha) = f(x)[/tex]?
I guess we try it. Say, take one of your functions

[tex]f(x)=cosx^2, f(x+a)=cos(x+a)^2[/tex] then we want to show whether f(x)=f(x+a) or not.

[tex]cosx^2=cos(x+a)^2=>cosx^2-cos(x+a)^2=0=>-2sin\frac{x^2+(a+x)^2}{2}sin\frac{x^2-(a+x)^2}{2}=0[/tex]

Now this is zero when

[tex]sin\frac{x^2+(a+x)^2}{2}=0, or:sin\frac{x^2-(a+x)^2}{2}=0[/tex]

From the first, it is zero when

[tex]x^2+(a+x)^2=2k\pi[/tex]

But from the second one we get

[tex]x^2-(a+x)^2=2k\pi=>x^2-a^2-2ax-x^2=2k\pi=>-a^2-2ax=2k\pi[/tex]

[tex]a^2+2ax+2k\pi=0[/tex] since

[tex]D=b^2-4ac=4a^2x^2-8k^2\pi^2[/tex]

Then i guess we conclude that this function is not periodic since we cannot locate a without expressing it in terms of x. So, it means that a is a function of x, which means that a changes as x changes, but is not rather a fixed number that is valid for all x-es, i don't know though my reasoning might be totally wrong.
 
That is overkill. If any function is periodic, the values of x for which it takes a given value are an arithmetic progression. E.g. cos (x)=1 for x =0, 2pi, 4pi, 6pi etc.

Now, where is cos(x^2) equal to 1? at the square roots of those values, and they aren't an arithmetic progression.
 
Is it possible to construct an example x = f(x)+g(x), where f and g are periodic functions?
 
matt grime said:
That is overkill. If any function is periodic, the values of x for which it takes a given value are an arithmetic progression. E.g. cos (x)=1 for x =0, 2pi, 4pi, 6pi etc.

Now, where is cos(x^2) equal to 1? at the square roots of those values, and they aren't an arithmetic progression.

I see your point, but it is hard to make it precise.

For example,
  • f(x) = { 0 if x is integer; a random value between 0.1 and 0.2 if x is non-integer } takes a value of 0 for x in an arithmetic progression. Is it periodic?
  • g(x) = sin(x) + sin(2x) takes a value of 0 for x in an arithmetic progression, but also on other values of x, yet it is periodic.
  • h(x) = { 1 if exp(x) divides pi, 0 otherwise } takes a value of 0 for x in an arithmetic progression, but also on other values of x, and it is not periodic.

Surely something must be said for all values of the function in a range, not only for one value.
 
  • #10
What do you mean 'isn't precise'? On reflection I'd say what I wrote is wrong. I should have said the sequence of zeroes is a union of arithmetic sequences.

Let's take your examples.

1: isn't even a function

2: sorry, don't see the point here. (actually, I think I do).

3: what does it mean for something to divide pi? Divides in what ring?

Perhaps you want extra detail, but all that detail is is that the sequence of the square roots of 2pi, 4pi etc contains no infinite arithmetic progression, which doesn't need any justification, really. I do get your point, though, and I shouldn't have left the details to the reader.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
thank you very much for the help mates...
i got it
they r not periodic
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K