Permutation and combination problems.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a permutation and combination problem involving six people, where A, B, and C must be separated in their arrangement. The initial misunderstanding arises from the interpretation of "must be separate," leading to incorrect calculations. Participants clarify that "separate" means no two of A, B, or C can be adjacent, and suggest methods to visualize the arrangement by first placing D, E, and F to create gaps for A, B, and C. Ultimately, the correct solution involves calculating the arrangements while ensuring the specified separation, resulting in a total of 144 valid configurations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the constraints in permutation problems for accurate solutions.
kenny1999
Messages
235
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



I forget the exact expression of the questions. But the related details are exhaustive here.
it's about permutation and combination. By the way, I am not student, i am looking for explanation and understanding, not answers..

1. There are 6 people, namely A, B, C, D, E, F in a row, how many ways of arrangement are there such that person A,B,C must be separated

Homework Equations



No equation given


The Attempt at a Solution



I especially paid attention to the word "must be separate", then I first count the number of ways that A,B and C "must be grouped" together. which result in 3! (arrangement within A,B,C) and then multiply 4! (taken ABC as one object).

Then for 6 people randomly arranged in order there are 6!. It's easy.

so the solution i think should be 6! - 3! x 4!

however, that was wrong. the solution is 3! x 4!

I feel so hard understanding why.

I don't know what they mean by "must be separate" here, how about, for example, A E F B C D? when B and C are combined while A is separate from them. Did I forgot to minus this possibility?

The answer is actually 144 but I get no idea about it.


I am not really clever, please explain in a simple way. Thanks people. Thanks people
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi kenny! :wink:
kenny1999 said:
I don't know what they mean by "must be separate" here, how about, for example, A E F B C D? when B and C are combined while A is separate from them. Did I forgot to minus this possibility?

yes, that's right :smile:

"separate" means no two are together

here's another way to do it:

place A B and C first, with two gaps in between (how many ways are there of doing that?)

then place D E and F (how many ways are there of doing that? you know that at least one of them has to be in the first gap)​

have another go! (both ways) :smile:
 
Another explanation:
1. Arrange D, E, F as shown -D-E-F- , there are x ways to do that.
2. Now there are 4 positions (each denoted by a dash) to place A, B, C at.
First choose 3 positions from 4, there are y ways to do that.
Then make an arrangement among 3 peoples, this could be done in z ways.
3. Multiply things out and you'll get the answer.
 
i wonder! :rolleyes:

can you calculate how many different ways are there of solving this question? :biggrin:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi kenny! :wink:


yes, that's right :smile:

"separate" means no two are together

here's another way to do it:

place A B and C first, with two gaps in between (how many ways are there of doing that?)

then place D E and F (how many ways are there of doing that? you know that at least one of them has to be in the first gap)​

have another go! (both ways) :smile:

i've worked out a formula for this problem, but is the formula correct?


3!x3! + 3!x3! + 3!x3! + 3!x3! = 144
 
well, the result is correct :smile:

but what's your justification for it? :confused:
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top