Perturbation Theory - expressing the perturbation

Zero1010
Messages
40
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Specify the perturbation for the Coulomb model of hydrogen.
Relevant Equations
##V(x) =

\begin{cases}

-\frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{b}{r^{2}} \text{if } 0<r \leq 0 \\

-\frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{1}{r} \text{if } r > 0

\end{cases} ##
Hi,

I just need someone to check if I am on the right track here

Below is a mutual Coulomb potential energy between the electron and proton in a hydrogen atom which is the perturbed system:

##V(x) =
\begin{cases}
- \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{b}{r^{2}} \text{for } 0<r \leq 0 \\
- \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{1}{r} \text{for } r > 0
\end{cases} ##

Where e = mag of electron charge, B = a constant length, ##4\pi\epsilon_{0}## = permittivity of free space

Using this I need to specify the perturbation of the system.

Since V(x) is the perturbed system is the total perturbation the sum of both these functions across the length?

In which case I get:

##\delta\hat H = - \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{b}{r^{2}} + (- \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{1}{r})##

##\delta\hat H = - \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}(\frac{b}{r^{2}} + \frac{1}{r})##

I just want to check if this is the correct way to go about this?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand the potential you are looking at. Usually for the hydrogen atom you just use the simple Coulomb potential. What does the first line mean? ##0<r \leq 0## is self-contradictory, because ##r>0## already implies that ##r \neq 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes Zero1010
Thanks for the reply.

Sorry that's my typo it should be:

##0 \lt r \leq b##

and the second one should be

##r \gt b##

Also in the question it says to suppose there is a deviation from Coulombs law at very small distances (even though there is no evidence for it)
 
Zero1010 said:
Homework Statement:: Specify the perturbation for the Coulomb model of hydrogen.
Relevant Equations:: ##V(x) =

\begin{cases}

-\frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{b}{r^{2}} \text{if } 0<r \leq 0 \\

-\frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{1}{r} \text{if } r > 0

\end{cases} ##

Hi,

I just need someone to check if I am on the right track here

Below is a mutual Coulomb potential energy between the electron and proton in a hydrogen atom which is the perturbed system:

##V(x) =
\begin{cases}
- \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{b}{r^{2}} \text{for } 0<r \leq 0 \\
- \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{1}{r} \text{for } r > 0
\end{cases} ##

Where e = mag of electron charge, B = a constant length, ##4\pi\epsilon_{0}## = permittivity of free space

Using this I need to specify the perturbation of the system.

Since V(x) is the perturbed system is the total perturbation the sum of both these functions across the length?

In which case I get:

##\delta\hat H = - \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{b}{r^{2}} + (- \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{1}{r})##

##\delta\hat H = - \frac{e^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}(\frac{b}{r^{2}} + \frac{1}{r})##

I just want to check if this is the correct way to go about this?

Thanks in advance.
You should be subtracting the Coulomb potential in ##\delta\hat H##.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Zero1010
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top