PF Glitch: Unreproducible Error - Greg & Chroot

  • Thread starter Thread starter Borek
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a non-reproducible error related to a PF glitch, possibly linked to mailbox capacity at 96%. Users speculate that the issue may stem from the physorg RSS feed, which could be temporarily unavailable during updates. There is a suggestion that the problem might be random and not consistent across users. Participants express curiosity about whether others are experiencing similar errors. Overall, the conversation highlights the uncertainty surrounding the glitch and its potential causes.
Borek
Mentor
Messages
29,125
Reaction score
4,546
Could be something completely random, and it is not reproducible, still, Greg or Chroot may be interested.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.png
    Untitled-1.png
    51.1 KB · Views: 486
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm, maybe it's your mailbox. It's on 96%, perhaps it is starting to throw out messages
 
It's the physorg rss feed. Is anyone else getting those errors? I normally see that error if they are updating something and the feed is unavailable. Usually temporary.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top