Suggestion PF needs a medical physics forum

  • Thread starter Thread starter tramar
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
There is a request for the creation of a dedicated medical physics forum, as current physics categories do not adequately address the specific interests of medical physics professionals and students. The discussion highlights a variety of relevant topics, such as IMRT, treatment planning, and diagnostic imaging, suggesting there is sufficient content to justify a separate forum. However, concerns are raised about the actual demand for such a forum, noting that many medical physics discussions could fit within existing physics categories. It is emphasized that the distinction of medical physics lies in its application rather than the underlying science. The existing medical sciences forum is suggested as an alternative for questions related to the medical aspects of the field.
tramar
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I think this has been mentioned somewhere before, but I'd like to request that a medical physics forum be created. Under the physics category there are forums for pretty much every field: classical, quantum, nuclear/particle, solid state, etc. There are many medical physics people out there as well as students interested in talking about it.

There are more than enough topics to warrant its own forum: IMRT, VMAT, Optimizations, treatment planning, image-guided radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, diagnostic imaging, brachytherapy, quality assurance, phantoms, CT, MRI, PET, ... and the list goes on.

Opinions welcome :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How many threads are there in the general physics forum that would be more suitable to be posted in a medical physics forum? There has to be a demand before a new forum is made.
 
tramar said:
There are more than enough topics to warrant its own forum: IMRT, VMAT, Optimizations, treatment planning, image-guided radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, diagnostic imaging, brachytherapy, quality assurance, phantoms, CT, MRI, PET, ... and the list goes on.

As long as there are no people wanting to discuss these things here, wealth of subjects doesn't guarantee traffic.
 
Most medical physics topics would fit within other disciplines of physics. What makes it medical physics is the application of the research, not the basic science behind it. The vast majority of it would fit within nuclear physics, since that's the science and technology behind the medical applications.

Usually, the only posts I see about medical physics around here are the occasional student asking about career options or choosing a school for graduate study, which are pretty much all redundant questions.

If someone has questions more pertaining to the medical side than the physics side, they are also welcome to post those questions in the medical sciences forum. That's a broad category of anything pertaining to medicine.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top