PF Photo Contest - You Cannot Violate The Laws Of Physics (7/16-7/22)

  • Thread starter ZapperZ
  • Start date

ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
2018 Award
35,186
3,977
You cannot violate the laws of physics

Sure you can't, but can you find photos that makes it APPEARS to be that you are? That's our theme for this week. Your photos must contain something that makes it appears as if a law of physics is being violated.

Good luck!


Contest Rules:

1. Any digital photo or digitally-scanned photo relevant to the theme will be accepted within the contest period. In case there's a gray area, or you're not sure if the picture is suitable, check with me first.

2. Please resize your digital photo to no more than 800 x 600 or 600 x 800 pixels. You may also crop your picture if you wish. You are also allowed to adjust the brightness and contrast of your picture but these should not dramatically alter the look of the picture. But other than those, any form of picture editing or modification is not allowed. This is a photo contest, not a picture editing/special effect contest. You may add a watermark or your name/nickname to the photo for identification purposes.

3. Upload your photos to any of the photo servers such as imageshack or photobucket. Then post it the relevant contest thread and link your picture using the img command. PM me if you do not know how.

4. Only ONE picture per member per contest. Once a picture is posted, it cannot be changed other than a total withdrawl by that member from that week's photo contest. Exceptions will be made for modification to comply with the rules, such as resizing.

5. At the end of the contest period, I will open a poll and every PF member can vote for the picture they like best.

6. Note that in case we have a large number of entries, I will do the polling in more than one thread. If that's the case, you can vote in each of the polling threads. The photos will be assigned in the polling threads in the order they were submitted.

7. These pictures must be something that you took, not something taken off someone else's photo albums or taken by someone else. I have no way of checking if you did this, so we'll go by the honor system.

8. You can use a picture only once. Once it is used in a contest, it cannot be reused in another contest.

9. Please post only pictures meant for submission in this thread

Zz.
 

turbo

Gold Member
3,028
45
Finally! A chance to use this one. I shot a flash picture of a fossil-rock that was resting on top of my woodbox. The top is pine painted an antique mustard yellow. When I downloaded the image to my PC, I was surprised to see that the rock appears to be levitating. Very odd effect.

floatingfossil_comt.jpg
 
671
16
My magnetic suspension system
levitate.png
 

Andy Resnick

Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
7,294
1,700
The inspiration for this was Rutherford's comment regarding his discovery of the atomic nucleus: a result "as surprising as if you were to fire cannon balls at tissue paper and have them bounce back at you"

[PLAIN]http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/9615/dsc8484u.jpg [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
2018 Award
35,186
3,977
Last day to submit a photo that appears to violate the laws of physics.

C'mon! Where are all the crackpots when you need them?

:)

Zz.
 
6,171
1,275
Khemist, did you take that photo yourself?
 

ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
2018 Award
35,186
3,977
That is what I would like to know too. If it isn't clarified by the deadline, I cannot use it as part of this contest.

Zz.
 

rhody

Gold Member
629
3
These pictures must be something that you took, not something taken off someone else's photo albums or taken by someone else. I have no way of checking if you did this, so we'll go by the honor system.
I am no expert, but if you look ever so closely at his feet you will see a small thin line of lighter pixels around each of his shoes. It looks like he photo shopped himself into the background. If photo shopping is allowed and he took a picture of himself and edited it into the background, does it still qualify ?

Rhody...
 
I am no expert, but if you look ever so closely at his feet you will see a small thin line of lighter pixels around each of his shoes. It looks like he photo shopped himself into the background. If photo shopping is allowed and he took a picture of himself and edited it into the background, does it still qualify ?

Rhody...
Rule #2 would disqualify that. you can crop, edit brightness/contrast, but not make dramatic changes.

I'll confess to just loving turbo's first pic for this contest.
 

turbo

Gold Member
3,028
45
I'll confess to just loving turbo's first pic for this contest.
And I'll confess to having NO idea how this picture showed up looking so oddly. The rock was sitting on the top of our wood-box and when I shot it and downloaded to my PC, it seemed like the rock was floating. I haven't been able to replicate that. It's just odd.
 

Pengwuino

Gold Member
4,854
14
I am no expert, but if you look ever so closely at his feet you will see a small thin line of lighter pixels around each of his shoes. It looks like he photo shopped himself into the background. If photo shopping is allowed and he took a picture of himself and edited it into the background, does it still qualify ?

Rhody...
Personally I think he's just jumping and in mid-air. His shirt seems to be moving upwards. Must have been a fast exposure.
 

rhody

Gold Member
629
3
Personally I think he's just jumping and in mid-air. His shirt seems to be moving upwards. Must have been a fast exposure.
Ok Peng,

Then, what about the small ribbon of pixels around his shoes ? Plus the shadows on his body don't match the natural light angle either.
Or, are you just busting my chops for another laugh, which is it ?

Rhody...
 

Pengwuino

Gold Member
4,854
14
Ok Peng,

Then, what about the small ribbon of pixels around his shoes ? Plus the shadows on his body don't match the natural light angle either.
Or, are you just busting my chops for another laugh, which is it ?

Rhody...
I don't really think the lighting looks wrong, but I don't really have much training in this :P I don't know what you're talking about with his shoes though.
 

rhody

Gold Member
629
3
I don't really think the lighting looks wrong, but I don't really have much training in this :P I don't know what you're talking about with his shoes though.
2llbz9t.jpg


Look at his left leg and how the color is different (almost white, not the color of the background) right around the edge of his shoe and pants. I don't think that is natural, just a bad photo shop job. I know an expert and he spent 45 minutes with photo shop and removed a washed out area from the right shoulder a picture of my daughter in Hawaii a few years back, unless you had criminal or experimental pixel analysis software, no one could tell the difference. This on the other hand is an obvious (to me anyway) hack job.

Maybe he was trying to be funny, Zz's last comment in the post before was:
C'mon! Where are all the crackpots when you need them?
Rhody...
 

ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
2018 Award
35,186
3,977
img3930l.jpg


Zz.
 

Pengwuino

Gold Member
4,854
14
Look at his left leg and how the color is different (almost white, not the color of the background) right around the edge of his shoe and pants. I don't think that is natural, just a bad photo shop job. I know an expert and he spent 45 minutes with photo shop and removed a washed out area from the right shoulder a picture of my daughter in Hawaii a few years back, unless you had criminal or experimental pixel analysis software, no one could tell the difference. This on the other hand is an obvious (to me anyway) hack job.
To me, that's clearly the water crashing together in the background. I haven't really zoomed in however, as I barely care :P Take that!
 

I like Serena

Homework Helper
6,553
176
As far as I can tell, if it were photo shopped he did a good job, except for the apparent artefact under his left foot, which *just* might be something else.
The lighting looks right and the blending seems to be proper (except for the artefact).

So the only thing wrong with it would be that it appears to violate the laws of physics, being in the picture himself, and being seen as levitating. :smile:

A clarification would be nice though. :wink:
 

fuzzyfelt

Gold Member
749
4
As far as I can tell, if it were photo shopped he did a good job, except for the apparent artefact under his left foot, which *just* might be something else.
The lighting looks right and the blending seems to be proper (except for the artefact).

So the only thing wrong with it would be that it appears to violate the laws of physics, being in the picture himself, and being seen as levitating. :smile:

A clarification would be nice though. :wink:
(my bolding)

Ok, that explains my confusion. I didn't know that this was known to be khemist in the shot. Questions of photoshopping were another matter.
 

I like Serena

Homework Helper
6,553
176
(my bolding)

Ok, that explains my confusion. I didn't know that this was known to be khemist in the shot. Questions of photoshopping were another matter.
Sorry, I do not know if this is khemist in the shot.
It would appear to violate the laws of physics though, if he is! :wink:
 

ZapperZ

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
2018 Award
35,186
3,977
Just wondering why? The photo is not dissimilar to the photo in post no. 5 in this thread-
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=496724
I need confirmation that this photo was taken by the member submitting it, and not taken off another source. Since the member listed a link to another site, and there's no clarification that he/she took it, there's no way to determine this.

While the photos in this contest may appear to violate the laws of physics, it cannot appear to violate the rules of the contest.

Zz.
 

fuzzyfelt

Gold Member
749
4
Sorry, I do not know if this is khemist in the shot.
It would appear to violate the laws of physics though, if he is! :wink:
I need confirmation that this photo was taken by the member submitting it, and not taken off another source. Since the member listed a link to another site, and there's no clarification that he/she took it, there's no way to determine this.

While the photos in this contest may appear to violate the laws of physics, it cannot appear to violate the rules of the contest.

Zz.
:) I understand now! Thanks very much for the responses.
 
253
0
lol you guys are crazy. I just used a timed shutter and a stopwatch to time it....

Are you seriously accusing me of cheating in an online photo contest? I dont even win anything! But I guess I am flattered?
 

I like Serena

Homework Helper
6,553
176
Funny! You would probably have won! Pity you did not clarify this in time. :smile:
 

Related Threads for: PF Photo Contest - You Cannot Violate The Laws Of Physics (7/16-7/22)

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
948
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
789
Replies
4
Views
876
Replies
6
Views
938
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Top