PF Tracking Cookies: Harmful or Helpful?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phrak
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of tracking cookies on the Physics Forum, with some users questioning why Norton 360 identifies them as potential threats. Participants clarify that these cookies are essential for saving user information and improving site navigation, despite Norton only flagging unrelated cookies. There is frustration expressed regarding Norton’s effectiveness, with suggestions to switch to alternative antivirus software like AVG. Additionally, the technical function of cookies is explained, highlighting their role in maintaining user sessions and improving website interaction. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the misunderstanding of cookies and their importance in web browsing.
Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
Why is Physics Forum launching what Norton 360 identifies as "Virus and Spyware".

Several tests tell me these originate on this site.

Just curious.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They're just cookies that save some information so it doesn't have to be downloaded every time.

Norton 360 never finds the PF cookies, every time it runs it ONLY finds the TV guide tracking cookie and deletes it, causing me to have to re-select my location everytime. It's really stupid and annoying. Norton is really useless at this kind of thing.
 
Evo said:
They're just cookies that save some information so it doesn't have to be downloaded every time.

Norton 360 never finds the PF cookies, every time it runs it ONLY finds the TV guide tracking cookie and deletes it, causing me to have to re-select my location everytime. It's really stupid and annoying. Norton is really useless at this kind of thing.

I don't know what TV guide is. I enter PF then run Norton 360 to start with a clean slate. After a while I run Norton again, and get a hit. Why is that?
 
I've moved this to feedback.
 
Yeah that's just a basic cookie that the site uses...

My question is:

Why are you people using Norton?

Download AVG 9.0.. It's free and it's 100000000x better than norton, and most anti-virus programs out. My dad does IT service for banks and other companies in the area and he swears by it.

While you're at it get:
Ad-Aware
Spybot
 
Phrak said:
I don't know what TV guide is. I enter PF then run Norton 360 to start with a clean slate. After a while I run Norton again, and get a hit. Why is that?

Because everytime you visit a page on PF (or the internet in general), it downloads a "cookie" to your computer, which just saves the information for that page, making it easier and faster to access it again. That's why websites that you've visited before (that you haven't deleted the cookies for) come up quicker than pages that you've never been to.
 
Kronos5253 said:
Because everytime you visit a page on PF (or the internet in general), it downloads a "cookie" to your computer, which just saves the information for that page, making it easier and faster to access it again. That's why websites that you've visited before (that you haven't deleted the cookies for) come up quicker than pages that you've never been to.
Actually, how fast a web page loads doesn't have anything to do with cookies. (If anything, the quickest load time is achieved with no cookies at all) It depends mostly on caching, bandwidth, and server load.

The cookie simply allows a web server to correlate different visits by the same browser. E.g. when you log into PF, the server sends your browser a cookie with unique session ID, some string like D7YKKKK14UIDDV55514, and the server also records "user diazona is logged in with session ID D7YKKKK14UIDDV55514" in its own database. Then later on, when you access another page on PF, the browser sends that cookie (including the session ID) to the server, and the server can check the ID in its database to see that it corresponds to a logged-in user. That's how it can tell me apart from you or an anonymous guest.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top