PGRE | Resistor Combination Circuit

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving a circuit problem by determining the equivalent resistance and using Ohm's law to find the current. The main challenge is recognizing series and parallel resistor combinations in a complex circuit. Initially, the circuit appears to lack clear series or parallel opportunities, as components do not share the necessary nodes for such configurations. However, the concept of symmetry in the circuit is highlighted as a key strategy. If nodes have the same potential, components connected between them can be removed without affecting the circuit. This insight allows for the elimination of certain resistors, simplifying the circuit into two sets of parallel resistors, which can then be combined with others in series. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing symmetry to simplify circuit analysis.
CanIExplore
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello forum, please see the attached image.

This problem amounts to finding the equivalent resistance for the circuit and using Ohm's law to solve for the current.


Homework Equations



V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


What I really need help with is learning how to recognize series and parallel combinations in complicated circuits like this one. It's difficult for me to see any possible combination, series or parallel, in this circuit. It looks to me that if you follow the current down from the top of the resistors, that the first three are definitely parallel, but then those are also in parallel with the others so I really don't see how you're supposed to combine them.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
CanIExplore said:
What I really need help with is learning how to recognize series and parallel combinations in complicated circuits like this one. It's difficult for me to see any possible combination, series or parallel, in this circuit. It looks to me that if you follow the current down from the top of the resistors, that the first three are definitely parallel, but then those are also in parallel with the others so I really don't see how you're supposed to combine them.

Your confusion is not without good reason: there are no explicit series or parallel resistor opportunities to exploit in the circuit as it is.

For two components to be in parallel, their leads must share exactly two nodes; you should be able to trace a continuous loop through both components without passing through any other component. No such opportunities exist in the diagram.

For two components to be in series, one lead from each component must share the same node alone; no other connections are permitted to that node. Again, no such opportunities present themselves in the diagram.

What you can do, though, is take advantage of the symmetry that exists in the circuit. If two separate nodes have the same potential, then any component connected between those nodes will carry no current and that component can be removed or shorted without affecting the circuit operation! Can you spot any candidate components for removal?
 
Last edited:
I had not thought of that before. So I think I can eliminate 2 resistors using this method which I crossed out in the "Equipotential nodes" image I have attached. I can do this since the potential difference between nodes 1 and 2 is the same as the potential difference between nodes 1 and 3 and 1 and 4 correct? Therefore, nodes 2, 3, and 4 should all be at the same potential allowing me to remove the resistors in between them. Then I end up with the reduced circuit I have drawn in the final attached image. Which is now a combination of two sets of parallel resistors. 1, 2, and 3 can be added in parallel and the same goes with 4, 5, and 6. Which leaves me with 2 resistors in series.

Thank you so much gneill.
 

Attachments

  • Equipotential nodes.bmp
    Equipotential nodes.bmp
    276.6 KB · Views: 532
  • reduced circuit.jpg
    reduced circuit.jpg
    7.6 KB · Views: 489
I am not confident about doing this one but I agree with gneill.
Look at the symmetry, I think a lot can be ignored (discounted) because of the symmetry.
Half way is half way ! It does not sound rigorous but that would get me started.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
848
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K