hokhani
- 601
- 22
Why for the free particle, the group velocity and phase velocity are not the same while we have only one wave? What is the envelope here?
The discussion revolves around the concepts of phase velocity and group velocity for a free particle in quantum mechanics. Participants explore the relationship between these velocities, particularly in the context of wave functions and the implications of having a single frequency component versus a superposition of frequencies.
Participants express differing views on the implications of having a single frequency versus multiple frequencies. There is no consensus on the interpretation of group velocity in the context of a single frequency wave, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of different models and interpretations.
Some participants reference mathematical relationships and concepts such as the uncertainty principle and dispersion relations, but these discussions are not universally agreed upon and depend on specific interpretations of quantum mechanics.
Thanks. In the case of the free particle, we only have one wave component with one frequency. Why its phase and group velocities are different?jfizzix said:However, if you break up the wave components in terms of frequency, and the range of frequencies is narrow enough that any frequency in it is linearly related to momentum (i.e., so that \omega\approx \omega_{0} + \frac{d\omega}{dk} \Delta k, then you can express the wave as though it were a wave of the average frequency moving at speed \omega/k, times an envelope traveling at speed d\omega/dk .
Which free particle state do you mean? The eigensolutions to Schrödinger's equation for a free particle are infinite plane waves with different frequencies according to the energy eigenvalues (here I'm glossing over some mathematical subtleties about continuous spectra and normalizability).hokhani said:In the case of the free particle, we only have one wave component with one frequency.
Please consider one dimensional free particle at an energy E which has two components with k and -k wave vectors but with the same frequency. Therefore, there are two phase velocities in opposite directions. Could you please say what is the group velocity of this particle?Nugatory said:The general states of a free particle are superpositions of these plane waves, which can be chosen to give us a physically reasonable wave packet for which the notion of group velocity makes sense. But when you specify that you're considering the case in which only one frequency is present... well, what is the "mean position of the particle" to which @jfizzix refers?
hokhani said:Thanks. In the case of the free particle, we only have one wave component with one frequency. Why its phase and group velocities are different?
Obviously you are mixing some models. Let's take a look at the finite quantum well example. Here the bounded eigen states from the time-independent Schrödinger equation are standing waves. A standing wave results from two waves of same frequency and amplitude but opposite direction of moving that interfere. If the quantum well has a depth of ##E_0##, than eigen states with energy ##E > E_0## are unbound and referred to as "free" states. But I guess here is the point where you are mixing it up. This free states are not the states that can describe free particles moving in space, because these free states are plane waves that lead to location probability of an electron everywhere the same in the whole univers. Its momentum is sharply defined but its location is absolutely uncertain.hokhani said:Please consider one dimensional free particle at an energy E which has two components with k and -k wave vectors but with the same frequency. Therefore, there are two phase velocities in opposite directions. Could you please say what is the group velocity of this particle?
Thank you very much for your thorough explanation. I can understand the phase velocity concept, as the velocity by which the phase is moving, but what is the concept of group velocity in this case (free particle)?jfizzix said:In the case of a free particle, for it to have a well-defined location, it has to be made up of many different frequency and momentum components, since a single frequency wave is a sine wave that extends over all space.
For a free particle (not counting relativistic effects):
\hbar\omega=E=\frac{p^{2}}{2m}=\frac{\hbar^{2}k^{2}}{2m}
Solving for frequency, we get the relation:
\omega = \frac{\hbar k^{2}}{2m} \approx \omega_{0} + \frac{\hbar k}{m} \Delta\omega
So the phase velocity function of a free particle is: \frac{\omega}{k}=\frac{\hbar k}{2m}
while the group velocity function of a free particle is: \frac{d\omega}{dk}=\frac{\hbar k}{m}
In this case, they are proportional, but always off by a factor of 1/2. The relation when including relativity can be more complicated, but one beautiful relation comes out (I'll spare you the derivation):
v_{g}v_{ph}=c^{2}
hokhani said:Thank you very much for your thorough explanation. I can understand the phase velocity concept, as the velocity by which the phase is moving, but what is the concept of group velocity in this case (free particle)?
The reason is that the dispersion relation is not linear for non-relativistic free ("Schrödinger") particles. We havehokhani said:Thanks. In the case of the free particle, we only have one wave component with one frequency. Why its phase and group velocities are different?