Phase difference in standing waves

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, participants explore the phase difference in standing waves, specifically proving that two x-positions with an even number of nodes between them exhibit a phase difference of 0, while those with an odd number of nodes show a phase difference of π. The standing wave equation y=2Acos(2πx/λ)sin(2πt/T) is referenced to illustrate these points. A graphical proof was provided by the teacher, but the user seeks an alternative, non-graphical proof. The explanation emphasizes that nodes occur where y=0, leading to the conclusion about phase differences based on the number of nodes. The conversation highlights the relationship between node positioning and phase differences in standing waves.
petermer
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have the standard standing wave equation, y=2Acos(2\pi \frac{x}{\lambda})sin(2\pi \frac{t}{T}). We must prove that if two x-positions on the wave have an even number of nodes between them, they have a phase difference of 0, whereas in the opposite condition, they have a phase difference of \pi.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My teacher already gave us a graphical approach of the proof. but I would like to know if there is another one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi petermer! :smile:

(have a pi: π :wink:)

I'm not sure what your question means, but anyway a node is a value of x for which y = 0 for all t.

So nodes are at t/T = n + π/2.

Can you take it from there? :smile:
 
Well, I'm just saying that if two x's have an even number of nodes between them, the phase inside the sine is 2\pi \frac{t}{T} if their y's are positive, or 2\pi \frac{t}{T} + \pi if their y's are negative. So they have a phase difference of 0. On the other hand, when the two x's have an odd number of nodes between them, it occurs that they have a phase difference of \pi (with the same thought applied before). Therefore, I'm asking for a non-graphical proof of this.

P.S.: I'm using the equation of the standing wave, where x=0 is an anti-node. That is, y=2Acos(2\pi \frac{x}{\lambda})sin(2\pi \frac{t}{T}), x being the position on the x-axis, y the position on the y-axis, λ the wavelength, t the time in sec, and T the period.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top