Phasor Leading and Lagging Angles

  • Thread starter XPTPCREWX
  • Start date
  • #1
101
0
Consider two voltage phasors:

V1 = 1 volt @ 50°, and
V2 = 1 volt @ 30°.

It follows then that the relative phase shift between these two phasors can be expressed by any of the four following descriptions in terms of leading and lagging angle relationships.

1.) V1 Leads V2 by 20°
2.) V1 Lags V2 by 340°
3.) V2 Leads V1 by 340°
4.) V2 Lags V1 by 20°

My question is: By using the above lead/lag positive angle displacements, does is make any sense or is it possible to instead express these same angles in terms of their corresponding negative angle displacements? If you could express it in terms of negative angles how would it be done? Would it negate a lead or lag?

ie. Modify description 1.) to V1 Leads V2 by 20° OR EQUIVALENTLY -340°

I just want to know if this is legal mathematically/conceptually or even makes sense. Some links or references to conventions or interpretations would be nice. Thanks in advance.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
NascentOxygen
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
9,244
1,072
V1 lags V2 by 340°
V1 lags V2 by -20°

V2 leads V1 by 340°
V2 leads V1 by -20°

The sinusiod is cyclic, so the general expression is V1 Leads V2 by (20° + n360°) for any integer n ≥ 0.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
101
0
V1 lags V2 by 340°
V1 lags V2 by -20°

V2 leads V1 by 340°
V2 leads V1 by -20°

The sinusiod is cyclic, so the general expression is V1 Leads V2 by (20° + n360°) for any integer n ≥ 0.

1.) Can you provide a reference about this for phasors?
2.) If n≥0 why did you express "V2 leads V1 by -20°"
3.) The terms "Lead" and "Lag" already contain information about which way to traverse the angle from the REFERENCE phasor. What does the negative mean in "V2 leads V1 by -20°"?

Typically V1 lags V2 by 20° means rotate C.W. starting from phasor V2 (REFERENCE) by 20°. So in this case we must traverse the plane in the negative angle (lagging or C.W.) direction, however i don't understand saying both leading or lagging AND -20°. It seems that this would be a double negative. Can you clarify what you mean by this?
 
  • #4
NascentOxygen
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
9,244
1,072
For sources, use google.

For any leading angle you can throw in an extra +n360°,
for any lagging angle you can include an additional -n360°.

Double negatives are fine, though best used judiciously. Leading by -20° is equivalent to lagging by +20°. But of course, for clarity it is best to keep to a positive angle and choose the appropriate lead/lag word to fiit.
 

Related Threads on Phasor Leading and Lagging Angles

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
874
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top