You realize this statement is false if there is even one iota of evidence against all life being sentient? If you wanted a position you had a chance of supporting, you should have said that there was insufficient evidence against all life being sentient. You've shown that you're less interested in coming to a logical conclusion than simply being right.
you seem to be more concerned with winning an argument than i am
i would rather raise some good questions, than claim to have all the answers
Humans in Papua New Guinea communicate very differently from humans in North America, but when a new tribe is discovered with a new language the lines of communciation are established very, very quickly.
this is an illiogical analogy, of course humans can adapt to other languages
humans are designed to use language for communication
other lifeforms may use chemical changes to communicate
or ultrasound, or complex low frequency oscillations, the possibilities are endless
Anyone who reads this statement is aware that you don't understand what sentient means.
im quite aware of what sentient means
here is the definition:
sentient
adj 1: endowed with feeling and consciousness, self awareness
so what part don't you understand?
A robot can react as efficiently or more efficiently than a fly. I can write a computer program in a matter of minutes that would mimick any insect alive. .
no, you can't... and you insult our intelligence by claiming that you can
robotics are not up to the level of the most retarded insect
even the robotics group at MIT can't match the abilities of a common housefly
Working to defend one's existence does not show awareness either.
prove it
This is a point for me, not for you. If you eat plants even though you think they could be aware, why not eat animals? The logical gap in your thinking is astounding.
i am not a vegetarian for philosophical reasons
animal protein is unhealthy and vegetable protein is not
it's also possible to live on fruit and fruit vegetables without killing plants
There need not be any 'death gene.' Things naturally tend toward corruption and aging over the course of their existence due to the law of entropy.
the population inversion of energy states in a laser violates entropy, therefore entropy is not a law
Or just as sentient, and science seems to back us up on that one.
what science are you referring to specifically?
Then you'd think they'd figure out a way to defeat the whalers and fishermen who hunt them. Even a basic manoeuvre like getting a big group together and attacking one of the boats, pushing on one side and tipping it over or something. But no, they don't.
you obviously have never studied the history of whaling
whales have capsized ships
and dolphins are not an aggressive species
humans are *******s by nature
i think they're very aware of our intelligence
Despite all the scientific evidence to the contrary, of course.
what evidence? post the scientific evidence to the contrary here
Everything I pointed out in my reply to Dissident Dan applies equally here. The basic 'symptoms' that would be required to demonstrate the sentience of any computer or robot are lacking in animals.
the most powerful computer on the planet does not even approach 1% the potential brain power of a rat
Also, even if all life were sentient, there are many, many animals who eat other animals. Why shouldn't we? Take bears, for example. Their anatomy is such that they could survive only on vegetable matter. But they choose to eat meat(if we believe they are sentient). So does every other carnivorous animal in the world. If they, as sentient beings, could justify it to themselves, why can't we as sentient beings do the same thing?
animals play, as humans play, and the act of playing clearly demonstrates that they are indeed sentient
humans measure everything by their own standards
but humans in truth are neither capable of self understanding
nor mutual understanding of their fellow humans
your case for justifying the exploitation of animals as food
is based on the statement - if it's ok for animals to eat other animals
and animals are sentient, therefore it's ok for humans to eat animals
humans are the only animal which hunts to extinction
and especially just for sport
the only animal which force breeds and genetically modifies other species
for profit (cash)
the only animal which conducts cruel experiments on other species to satisfy it's own lack of real knowledge and pseudo-scientific sadism
the only animal that taunts, tortures and mutilates other animals for the sake of sadistic pleasure
the only animal that pretends to be wise, respectable, intelligent, knowledgeable, and even devine and godlike in the face of it's own ignorance
and depravity
i believe that animal inteligence excedes human intelligence
humans are just too stupid to interpret the language
brain size has been used as an argument for human superiority
but there are several species with larger brains than humans
humans are the only animal that cannot thrive or even survive without artificial means
a naked human is no match in battle against 90% of the world's species
humans are weak and vulnerable, and make up for this insecurity with an inflated ego and big guns
the most pathetic animal of all